Institutional Repository

Affective-cognitive consistency of attitude as a moderator of the job satisfaction-performance relationship

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Visser, Delene
dc.contributor.author Van der Westhuizen, Sanet
dc.date.accessioned 2014-07-16T13:10:15Z
dc.date.available 2014-07-16T13:10:15Z
dc.date.issued 2005
dc.identifier.citation Visser, D. & Coetzee, S.C. (2005). Affective-cognitive consistency of attitude as a moderator of the job satisfaction-performance relationship. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 31 (3), 62-69. en
dc.identifier.issn 0258-5200
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/13657
dc.description.abstract Past research has often shown that job satisfaction and job performance are uncorrelated. The current study was an attempt to clarify the relationship by examining the role of affective-cognitive consistency (ACC) to test whether attitudinal consistency affects the strength of the relationship. A secondary objective was to assess whether modified versions of the Overall Job Satisfaction Scale (OJS) and the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ), administered to 166 full-time employees from a variety of companies, may be regarded as affective and cognitive measures of job satisfaction respectively. This view was supported by means of exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic results. Overall job satisfaction was measured by a composite of the modified OJS and MSQ, and job performance was rated on a 10-point scale by the employees' supervisors. Respondents' scores on the modified OJS and MSQ were then used to form groups that were high or low in ACC. For employees who displayed high ACC regarding their job satisfaction attitudes, medium to large positive correlations between the job satisfaction measures and performance were obtained. In contrast, non-significant correlations were recorded for the low ACC groups. The hypothesis that ACC is a significant moderator of the relationship between job satisfaction and job performance was therefore supported. en
dc.description.abstract Vorige navorsing het dikwels getoon dat werktevredenheid en werkprestasie nie korreleer nie. Dié ondersoek was ’n poging om lig te werp op hierdie verwantskap deur die rol van affektiewe-kognitiewe konsekwentheid (AKK) te ondersoek ten einde te toets of houdingkonsekwentheid die sterkte van die verwantskap beïnvloed. ’n Sekondêre doelwit was om te bepaal of gewysigde weergawes van die Overall Job Satisfaction Scale (OJS) en die Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ), toegepas op 166 voltydse werknemers van ’n verskeidenheid ondernemings, as affektiewe en kognitiewe metings van werktevredenheid respektiewelik, beskou kan word. Hierdie beskouing is ondersteun deur ondersoekende en bevestigende faktoranalitiese resultate. Algemene werktevredenheid is gemeet deur ’n kombinasie van die gewysigde OJS en MSQ en werkprestasie is beoordeel op ’n 10-punt skaal deur die werknemers se toesighouers. Respondente se tellings op die gewysigde OJS en MSQ is hierna gebruik om groepe te vorm wat hoog of laag in terme van AKK was. Vir werknemers met hoë AKK betreffende hul werktevredenheidhoudings is medium tot hoë positiewe korrelasies tussen die werktevredenheidmetings en prestasie behaal. In kontras hiermee is onbetekenisvolle korrelasies vir die lae AKK-groepe aangeteken. Die hipotese dat AKK ’n beduidende moderator van die verwantskap tussen werktevredenheid en werkprestasie is, is dus ondersteun. af
dc.language.iso en en
dc.subject.ddc 658.31422
dc.subject.lcsh Job satisfaction en
dc.subject.lcsh Job satisfaction -- Evaluation en
dc.subject.lcsh Performance standards en
dc.subject.lcsh Employees -- Rating of en
dc.title Affective-cognitive consistency of attitude as a moderator of the job satisfaction-performance relationship en
dc.type Article en
dc.description.department Industrial and Organisational Psychology en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics