dc.contributor.advisor |
Barnes, Neil
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Dos Santos Rocha, Judite
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-05-17T11:57:52Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2017-05-17T11:57:52Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2014-06 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/22546 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
A severe capital shortage in South Africa during the 1980s resulted in significant losses for both freight and passenger rail, which gave rise to cutbacks in new investments for rail. By 1986 expenditure on fixed rail assets was reduced from R1.44 billion to R500 million; this was the beginning of the decline of freight rail. During this period freight transport was deregulated and road freight used this opportunity to compete with rail transport in the same market segment by transporting bulk goods on long hauls. The result of this was an increase in truck traffic on the roads, causing a negative impact on the conditions of the road and placing freight rail in a continuous decline, leading to the obsolete state of the rail infrastructure, rolling stock and its under-utilisation. This had a detrimental impact on freight rail and the economy. Having realised the extent of the problem, government, through the Department of Transport (DoT), decided to intervene by changing the current model of the freight transport system. To that effect the DoT is in the process of developing a National Rail Policy, with the main focus being to encourage the shift of freight transportation of bulk commodities from road to rail.
As the National Rail Agency, Transnet undertakes all South Africa‟s freight rail operations through its Transnet Freight Rail (TFR) division. As such, TFR is ultimately responsible for the implementation of the road to rail implementation project. To that effect, TFR developed the MDS to revitalise itself and ensure its success.
The objective of this research is to (a) assess the capacity of TFR to successfully implement the road to rail policy; (b) determine whether the implementation of road to rail will lead to freight rail efficiency and competitiveness, reliability and sustainability; and (c) establish the industry‟s reaction towards the shift from road to rail.
In order to respond to the research question, qualitative research was chosen as the most appropriate approach. This facilitated an in-depth exploration and understanding
iii
of the issues around the road to rail project including how the industry feels about the issue, as well as an exploration of other possible alternatives which could provide the same or better results in a simpler and more effective manner.
This research may serve as additional information for authorities to consider during the implementation of the road to rail project, and could render a better chance of success.
Upon completion of this research the author concluded that Transnet Freight Rail has a good chance of success. The implementation of road to rail is being given adequate attention. Integration is possible as the industry welcomes and supports the road to rail programme, in fact a number of collaboration agreements already exist between rail and other transport modes. This will enable Transnet Freight Rail to achieve efficiency, sustainability and a competitive advantage within the seven year timeframe of the MDS. |
en |
dc.format.extent |
1 online resource (x, 113 leaves) ; illustrations (chiefly color), graphs (chiefly color) |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.subject.ddc |
385.240968 |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Railroads -- Freight -- South Africa |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Freight and freightage -- South Africa |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Railroads and state -- South Africa |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Feasibility studies -- South Africa |
en |
dc.title |
A feasibility assessment of government‟s road-to-rail policy Implementation: a freight logistics perspective |
en |
dc.type |
Research Report |
en |
dc.description.department |
Graduate School of Business Leadership |
en |
dc.description.degree |
M.B.A. |
|