Unisa Institutional Repository

On quantifying miltary strategy.

Show full item record

Title: On quantifying miltary strategy.
Author: Engelbrecht, Gerhard Nieuwoudt
Abstract: Military Strategy is defined as a plan at the military strategic level of war that consists of a set of military strategic ends, ways and means and the relationships between them. This definition leads to the following research questions: 1. How can the extent of the many-to-many relationships that exist between a military strategy, its ends, ways and means be quantified? 2. If the relationships between a military strategy, its ends, ways and means are quantified and if the effectiveness of the force design elements is known, how shall that enable the quantification of the state’s ability to execute its military strategy? 3. If the relationships between a military strategy, its ends, ways and means are quantified and if the effectiveness of the force design elements is known, how will it aid decision-making about the acquisition of the future force design? The first research question is answered by mapping a military strategy complete with its ends, ways and means to a ranked tree where the entities in the strategy corresponds with the vertices of different rank in the tree. The tree representation is used to define and determine the contribution of entities in a military strategy to entities at the next higher level. It is explained how analytical, heuristic and judgement methods can be employed to find the relative and real contribution values. Also, a military strategy for South Africa is developed to demonstrate the concept. The second research question is answered by developing measures of effectiveness taking the interdependence of entities at the terminal vertices of the ranked tree into account. Thereafter, the degree to which the force design would support the higher order entities inclusive of a military strategy could be calculated. The third research question is answered by developing a cost-benefit analysis method and a distance indicator from an optimal point to aid in deciding between supplier options for acquisition. Thereafter the knapsack problem is amended to allow for scheduling acquisition projects whilst optimising the force design's support of a military strategy. Finally, the model is validated and put into a contextual framework for use in the military.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10500/1527
Date: 2003-06
Citation:


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
08AppendixB.pdf 168.1Kb PDF View/Open
05Chapter5.pdf 173.4Kb PDF View/Open
02Chapter2.pdf 312.0Kb PDF View/Open
09AppendixC.pdf 84.01Kb PDF View/Open
00front.pdf 210.4Kb PDF View/Open
07AppendixA.pdf 89.60Kb PDF View/Open
03Chapter3.pdf 270.9Kb PDF View/Open
04Chapter4.pdf 238.1Kb PDF View/Open
01Chapter1.pdf 218.5Kb PDF View/Open
06Chapter6.pdf 149.4Kb PDF View/Open
13AppendixG.pdf 81.33Kb PDF View/Open
11AppendixE.pdf 64.08Kb PDF View/Open
12AppendixF.pdf 108.4Kb PDF View/Open
10AppendixD.pdf 60.49Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics