dc.contributor.author |
Romm, Norma
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-06-27T09:35:23Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-06-27T09:35:23Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2024-05-01 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Romm, N. R. (2024). An Indigenous Relational Approach to Systemic Thinking and Being: Focus on Participatory Onto-Epistemology. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 1-32. |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-024-09672-4 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10500/31336 |
|
dc.description |
In this article I discuss in depth an Indigenous systemic view of relationality with the focus on a participatory onto-epistemology (and attendant axiology). |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
This article is structured around my locating a lacuna in the (mainstream) literature
describing the history of the field of “systems thinking”. I investigate how dominant
accounts of this history do not include an account of the contributions of Indigenous sages
and scholars’ systemic thinking. Such thinking (and being) is grounded in a relational onto-epistemology and attendant axiology – where knowing is consciously tied to (re)generating reciprocal relations with others – human and more-than-human – as we enact worlds-in-the-making. The argument is that at the moment of “knowing/inquiring” we co-constitute with other agents (and not only human ones) the worlds that are brought forth. Otherwise expressed, there are never spectators, only participants in ongoing world-construction. I explore the way of explaining this as proffered by authors from a variety of geographical contexts as a backdrop to indicating how Indigenous critical systemic thinking has not been catered for by those writing the history of the so-called “systems community”. This is despite many Indigenous scholars self-naming their understandings as being systemic. I indicate that exploring global superwicked problems from the standpoint of an Indigenous onto-epistemology includes pointing to, and experimenting further with, radically different options for thinking-and-being than those that thus far have been storied by those writing the history of systems thinking. I indicate why it is important to take seriously this approach, rather than drowning its contribution. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
Springer |
en |
dc.subject |
knowing tied to being (worldmaking) |
en |
dc.subject |
Onto-epistemology |
en |
dc.subject |
Modern-colonial existence · |
en |
dc.subject |
Political ontology · |
en |
dc.subject |
Ways of relating |
en |
dc.title |
An Indigenous relational approach to systemic thinking and being: Focus on Participatory Onto-Epistemology |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.description.department |
Adult Basic Education (ABET) |
en |