dc.contributor.advisor |
Wessels, J. S.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Zongozzi, J. Nkosinathi
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-09-10T09:19:50Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2015-09-10T09:19:50Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2015-06 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Zongozzi, J. Nkosinathi (2015) Case studies in South African public administration master's dissertations in the period 2005 to 2012, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/19045> |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/19045 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Case studies have been frequently used by Public Administration students enrolled for master’s degrees by coursework and mini-dissertation. There are apparently various meanings of and a lack of clarity about the concept “case study” when used in the titles of South African Public Administration master’s dissertations. The purpose of this study was to analyse case studies reported on in South African Public Administration master’s dissertations in order to determine the characteristics of these studies. The study examined case studies in South African Public Administration master’s dissertations completed between 2005 and 2012. It began by reviewing the various components of a case study, then went further to analyse the way in which case studies were applied in the field. The study defined case study as a research process determined by a combination of the following components: a specific strategy for selecting the unit of analysis (the case), a specific research design, research purpose, the methods of data collection and data analysis, and a specific nature of the expected outcomes of the study. The major findings of the study were that most case studies in the analysed dissertations have used interventions (60,9%) as their case. About (43,5%) of the analysed dissertations were evaluative in nature. There is, however, an uneven distribution in terms of the case study design used by a significant proportion of the dissertations (83%) employing the single-case design as opposed to the multiple-case design (17%). The results presented in relation to case selection strategies used show that typical cases were the most investigated. Moreover, a number of the dissertations seemed to be more aligned towards qualitative methods, although mixed methods were mostly used. These dissertations preferred interviews as sources of evidence. Meanwhile, pattern matching appeared to be the dominant technique used to analyse case study evidence in these dissertations. Hypothesis generating was also identified as the outcome in most of the dissertations. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.subject |
Case study |
en |
dc.subject |
Public administration |
en |
dc.subject |
Dissertation |
en |
dc.subject.ddc |
808.06635 |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Public administration -- South Africa -- Case studies |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Dissertations, Academic -- South Africa -- Case studies |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Academic writing -- Case studies |
en |
dc.title |
Case studies in South African public administration master's dissertations in the period 2005 to 2012 |
en |
dc.type |
Dissertation |
en |
dc.description.department |
Public Administration and Management |
en |
dc.description.degree |
M. Admin. (Public Administration) |
|