dc.contributor.advisor |
Brynard, D.J.
|
en |
dc.contributor.advisor |
Ströh, E.C.
|
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Roberts, Benita Valera
|
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2009-08-25T10:53:36Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2009-08-25T10:53:36Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2009-08 |
|
dc.date.submitted |
2005-11-30 |
en |
dc.identifier.citation |
Roberts, Benita Valera (2009) Die reg op toegang tot inligting in publieke administrasie, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/1482> |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/1482 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (Act 108 of 1996) stipulates that every person has the right of access to information held by government. To give effect to this right, legislation in the form of the Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2000 (Act 2 of 2000) was promulgated. This study explores the access to information regime that was established by die aforementioned legislation with specific reference to similar regimes in the United States of America, Australia, New Zealand and Canada. Attention is also devoted to the prerequisites and potential obstacles associated with the implementation of the Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2000.
Based on the practices in other states, the conclusion was reached that the nature of information that may be requested in the South African context should be expanded, that cabinet records should only be excluded to the extent that disclosure thereof would be harmful, that frequently requested records should be made automatically available and that decision-making guidelines of government institutions should be published. As far as procedural requirements are concerned, it is proposed that information officers should acknowledge receipt of requests and that, where necessary, records should be translated to ensure that they are useful to a requester. It is further proposed that the wording of the ground of refusal regarding policy formulation and decision-making in government institutions be amended to take account of the consequences of disclosure. It is imperative that appeal and review mechanisms be accessible to members of the public and it is therefore proposed that an information commissioner be instituted to settle disputes in information related matters. Lastly it is proposed that sanctions be imposed against officials who deliberately undermine the public's right of access to information and that separate units be established in government institutions to deal exclusively with requests for access to information. |
en |
dc.format.extent |
1 online resource (xv, 283 leaves) |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.subject |
Access to information |
en |
dc.subject |
Accountability |
en |
dc.subject |
Appeal and review mechanisms |
en |
dc.subject |
Government |
en |
dc.subject |
Grounds for refusal of access to information |
en |
dc.subject |
Information |
en |
dc.subject |
Information officer |
en |
dc.subject |
Record |
en |
dc.subject |
Secrecy |
en |
dc.subject |
Transparency |
en |
dc.subject.ddc |
323.4450968 |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Freedom of information -- South Africa |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Government information -- South Africa |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Public records -- Access control -- South Africa |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Public records -- Law and legislation -- South Africa |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
South Africa. Constitution (1996) |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
South Africa Promotion of Access to Information, 2000 |
|
dc.title |
Die reg op toegang tot inligting in publieke administrasie |
en |
dc.type |
Thesis |
en |
dc.description.department |
Public Administration and Management |
en |
dc.description.degree |
D. Litt. et Phil. (Public Administration) |
en |