dc.contributor.author |
Romm, Norma R.A.
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2013-11-12T06:58:56Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2013-11-12T06:58:56Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
1998 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Romm, NRA (1998) Interdisciplinary Practice as Reflexivity. Systemic Practice and Action Research, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1998 pp 63-77 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
Print ISSN: 1094-429X; |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/11996 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This article considers ways in which interdisciplinarity may be practiced. The suggestion
is that interdisciplinarity as a practice can be understood as embracing a
reflexive orientation on the part of inquirers. It is this orientation which enables them
to entertain possibilities for taking on board ideas/interpretations exceeding the
boundary of some "source discipline." It is part of the responsibility of inquirers to
consider whether single discipline-based research might be unduly restrictive in its
way of seeing issues of concern and hence of constructing options for action. Interdisciplinary
processes imply that effort is expended to create fresh opportunities for
understanding-and-action through working with the juxtaposition and interplay of
different vantage points on inquiry. Possibilities for discursive accountability on the
part of all concerned are hereby extended. It is also suggested that calls for more
interdisciplinary inquiries are part of a larger project toward the increased democratization
of discussion about research practices in society. Discussions about the value
and validity of interdisciplinary inquiries may be seen as linked up with the pursuance
of such democratization. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
Springer |
en |
dc.subject |
interdisciplinary; reflexivity; responsibility; discursive accountability; |
en |
dc.title |
Interdisciplinary Practice as Reflexivity |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.description.department |
ABET and Youth Development |
en |