dc.contributor.author |
Romm, Norma R.A.
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2013-11-12T06:39:07Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2013-11-12T06:39:07Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2002 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Romm, Norma RA (2002) Systems Research and Behavioral Science Syst. Res.19, 455^467 (2002) Published onlineinWiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com)DOI:10.1002/sres.501 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
1099-1743 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
DOI:10.1002/sres.501 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/11992 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This paper offers an outline of, and justification for, what I call a ‘trusting constructivist’
approach to systemic inquiry. I work with the constructivist view that, as Banathy puts it:
‘what we know about the world becomes projected onto the world’. That is, our
theoretical constructions and ways of thinking in relation to the world cannot be
considered separately from the impacts that they might have on the unfolding of
possibilities. Recognizing our involvement in the development of systems means that we
can reconsider—with others—the status of our own constructions as potentially
generating self-fulfilling effects. A trusting constructivist view suggests that people
cannot desist from offering their own constructions (that embody particular concerns)
in processes of inquiry (professional or otherwise). But they need to recognize the
choices that they are making as they create constructions, so that they can account for
these in relation to alternatives in social discourse, in an endeavor to earn others’ trust. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
Wiley |
en |
dc.rights |
2002 Wiley |
|
dc.subject |
accountability |
en |
dc.subject |
systemic inquiry |
en |
dc.subject |
trust; (trusting) constructivism |
en |
dc.title |
A Trusting Constructivist Approach to Systemic Inquiry: Exploring Accountability |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.description.department |
ABET and Youth Development |
en |