Institutional Repository

Nicaea as political orthodoxy: Imperial Christianity versus episcopal polities

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Oliver, Erna
dc.contributor.author Rukuni, Rugare
dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-20T12:30:32Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-20T12:30:32Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.citation Rukuni, Rugare, & Erna Oliver. "Nicaea as political orthodoxy: Imperial Christianity versus episcopal polities." HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies [Online], 75.4 (2019): 10 pages
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/27044
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v75i4.5313
dc.description.abstract Fourth-century Christianity and the Council of Nicaea have continually been read as a Constantinian narrative. The dominancy of imperial Christianity has been a consequent feature of the established narrative regarding the events within early Christianity. There is a case for a revisionist enquiry regarding the influence of the emperor in the formation of orthodoxy. The role of bishops and its political characterisation had definitive implications upon Christianity as it would seem. Recent revisions on Constantine by Leithart and Barnes incited the enquiry. The enquiry was made possible through document analysis; this mainly took the form of a literature study. The orthodoxy that emerged at Nicaea in 325 CE was reflective of the political–orthodoxy trajectory that Christianity took beyond the 4th century. Between imperial intervention and clerical polities, one was a definitive dynamic to the then emergent Christianity. The influence of the emperor, which was an apparently definitive feature characterising the era, was compositely relevant as a catalyst in the formation of the Christianity that emerged during the 4th century. The implication that centuries before the Council of Nicaea Christianity had been characterised by significant phases of socio-cultural dynamics relegates the influence of the emperor. The emperor Constantine and his association with the Council of Nicaea characterised an era of imperial ecclesiastical politics in Christianity, and so did the Jewish–Christian Schism and a monarchical episcopate that shaped the orthodox matrix of the church. This research deduced that the function of imperial intervention should be analysed in conjunction with diverse factors characterising the Christianity emergent at Nicaea, particularly ecclesiastical polities. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher AOSIS en
dc.subject Church history; Imperial Christianity; Ecumenical orthodoxy; ecclesiastical politics; Constantine; Self-definition and Nicaea en
dc.title Nicaea as political orthodoxy: Imperial Christianity versus episcopal polities en
dc.type Article en
dc.description.department Christian Spirituality, Church History and Missiology en
dc.rights.holder © 2019 Rugare Rukuni | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics