Institutional Repository

Third-party litigation funding agreements : a comparative study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Floyd, Tomas Berry
dc.contributor.author Khoza, Mpho Justice
dc.date.accessioned 2019-08-27T12:27:44Z
dc.date.available 2019-08-27T12:27:44Z
dc.date.issued 2019-01
dc.date.submitted 2019-08-27
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/25716
dc.description.abstract In third-party litigation funding agreements, funders agree to finance a litigant’s litigation on condition that the funder will deduct a specified percentage from the capital awarded to the litigant in the event of success. In contingency fee agreements, such funding is provided by lawyers. Initially both these agreements were illegal in South Africa and England, but as civil courts became able to counter corruption and abuse – and with the recognition of the need to give more litigants access to justice – both were recognised as legal. Third-party litigation funding agreements by non-lawyers are unregulated in most jurisdictions. As the voluntary self-regulation in England is unsatisfactory, mandatory statutory regulation should be introduced in South Africa. The Contingency Fees Act 66 of 1997 caps the fee to 25% on the capital amount in South Africa. Since no such cap exists in Ontario (Canada), the cap of 25% in South Africa should be revised. en
dc.description.abstract Eka Mintwanano yo nyika nseketelo wa mali eka nandzu wa thedi phati, vanyiki va mali va pfumela ku hakela mali ya nandzu wa mumangali hi xipimelo xa leswaku munyiki wa mali u ta susa phesenteji leyi kombisiweke ku suka eka mali leyi nyikiweke mumangali loko a humelela. Eka mintwanano ya tihakelo ta vukorhokeri, nseketelo walowo wa mali wu nyikiwa hi maloyara. Ekusunguleni mintwanano leyi hinkwayo a yi nga ri enawini eAfrika Dzonga na le England, kambe tanihi leswi tikhoto ta mfumo ti koteke ku kokela etlhelo eka timhaka ta vukungundzwana na nxaniso- na ku anakanyiwa ka xilaveko xo nyika vamangali votala mfikelelo wa vululami- hinkwayo yi anakanyiwile tanihi leyi nga enawini. Mintwanano yo nyika nseketelo wa mali eka nandzu wa thedi phati hi vanhu lava nga riki maloyara a yi lawuriwi eka vuavanyisi byotala. Tanihileswi vutilawuri byo tinyiketa eEngland byi nga riki kahle, mafambiselo ya nawu lama lavekaka ya fanele ya tivisiwa eAfrika Dzonga. Nawu wa Tihakelo ta Vukorhokeri wa 66 wa 1997 wu veka mpimo wa hakelo eka 25% eka xiphemu xa tsengo wa mali eAfrika Dzonga. Ku sukela loko ku ri hava mpimo lowu nga kona eOntario (Canada), mpimo wa 25% eAfrika Dzonga wu fanele wu langutisiwa hi vuntshwa. ts
dc.description.abstract Kha thendelano dza ndambedzo dza mbilo ine ya itelwa muthu, vhabadeli vho tenda u badela mbilo ya muthu o no khou itelwa mbilo tenda mubadeli a tshi ḓo ṱusa phesenthe yo tiwaho kha tshelede yo avhelwaho muthu ane a khou itelwa mbilo arali a kunda. Kha thendelano dza mbadelo dzine dza badelwa musi ramilayo o no kunda kha mulandu, mbadelo idzo dzi ṋetshedzwa nga vhoramilayo. Mathomoni thendelano idzi vhuvhili hadzo dzo vha dzi siho mulayoni Afurika Tshipembe na England, fhedzi musi khothe dza mbilo dzi tshi vho thoma u hanedzana na tshanḓanguvhoni na u tambudzwa - na u dzhiela nṱha ṱhoḓea ya u ṋea vhathu vhane vha khou itelwa mbilo u swikelela vhulamukanyi –vhuvhili hadzo dzo dzhiwa sa dzi re mulayoni. Thendelano dza ndambedzo dza mbilo ine muthu a itelwa nga vhathu vhane vha sa vhe vhoramilayo a i langulwi kha vhulamukanyi vhunzhi. Samusi u langulwa ha ndaulo nga iwe muṋe hu ha u tou funa ngei England a zwi ṱanganedzwi, ndaulo ya khombekhombe ya mulayo i fanela u ḓivhadzwa Afurika Tshipembe. Mulayo wa Mbadelo dzine dza badelwa Ramilayo musi o kunda wa nomboro 66 wa 1997 mutengo wawo u guma kha 25% mutengo wa tshelede Afurika Tshipembe. Samusi tshikalo itsho tshi sa wanali ngei Ontario (Canada), tshikalo itsho tsha 25% Afurika Tshipembe tshi fanela u sedzuluswa hafhu. ve
dc.format.extent 1 online resource (xiii, 118 leaves) en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.subject Access to justice en
dc.subject Champerty en
dc.subject Conditional fee agreements en
dc.subject Contingency fee agreements en
dc.subject Lawyers en
dc.subject Maintenance en
dc.subject Non-lawyers en
dc.subject Pactum de quota litis la
dc.subject Public policy en
dc.subject Third-party litigation funding agreements en
dc.subject.ddc 347.57068
dc.subject.lcsh Third party litigation funding -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Third party litigation funding -- England en
dc.subject.lcsh Third party litigation funding -- Canada en
dc.subject.lcsh Contingent fees -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Contingent fees -- England en
dc.subject.lcsh Contingent fees -- Canada en
dc.subject.lcsh Lawyers -- Fees -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Lawyers -- Fees -- England en
dc.subject.lcsh Lawyers -- Fees -- Canada en
dc.subject.lcsh Practice of law -- Economic aspects -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Practice of law -- Economic aspects -- England en
dc.subject.lcsh Practice of law -- Economic aspects -- Canada en
dc.title Third-party litigation funding agreements : a comparative study en
dc.type Dissertation en
dc.description.department Private Law en
dc.description.degree LL. M.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics