Institutional Repository

Bioprospecting and intellectual property rights on African plant commons and knowledge: a new form of colonization viewed from an ethical perspective

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Motlhabi, M.B.G. en
dc.contributor.author Lenkabula, Puleng en
dc.date.accessioned 2009-08-25T10:46:06Z
dc.date.available 2009-08-25T10:46:06Z
dc.date.issued 2009-08-25T10:46:06Z
dc.date.submitted 2006-09 en
dc.identifier.citation Lenkabula, Puleng (2009) Bioprospecting and intellectual property rights on African plant commons and knowledge: a new form of colonization viewed from an ethical perspective, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/719> en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/719
dc.description.abstract This study engages in an ethical examination of contemporary socio-ecological and economic issues which takes seriously the plight of Africa, African communities, indigenous knowledge and biodiversity. It studies the impact of bioprospecting, biopiracy and intellectual property rights regimes on the protection, use, access to, and conservation of biodiversity and indigenous knowledge in Africa. The study also examines the ways in which northern multinational pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and their agents prospect and convert African resources (biological commons and indigenous knowledge) into their intellectual property as well as private property. It argues that the transfer of African biological commons and indigenous knowledge is exacerbated by economic globalisation and the neo-colonial mentality of conquest concealed under the guise of commerce. The study demonstrates through concrete case studies the tactics used by northern multinational corporations to claim these resources as their intellectual property rights and private property. It observes that the privatisation of biological commons and indigenous knowledge only brings about nominal or no benefits to African communities who have nurtured and continue to nurture them. It also observes that this privatisation results in fewer benefits for biodiversity as they lead to the promotion of monoculture, i.e. commercialisation of all things. To address the injustice and exploitative implications of bioprospecting, biopiracy and intellectual property rights, the study recommends the adoption and implementation of the African model law, the establishment of defensive intellectual property rights mechanisms, and the strategy of resistance and advocacy. It suggests that these measures ought to be grounded on the African normative principle of botho and the Christian ethical principle of justice. en
dc.format.extent 1 online resource (xiii, 247 leaves)
dc.language.iso en en
dc.subject Bioprospecting en
dc.subject Biopiracy en
dc.subject Intellectual property rights en
dc.subject Patents en
dc.subject Ethics en
dc.subject Botho/ ubuntu en
dc.subject Justice en
dc.subject Colonialism en
dc.subject Globalization en
dc.subject Privatisation en
dc.subject Multinational companies en
dc.subject Trips en
dc.subject.ddc 241.096
dc.subject.lcsh Christian ethics -- Africa
dc.subject.lcsh Traditional ecological knowledge -- Africa
dc.subject.lcsh Ethnoscience -- Africa
dc.subject.lcsh Ethnology -- Africa
dc.subject.lcsh Medicinal plants -- Africa
dc.subject.lcsh Biodiversity -- Africa
dc.subject.lcsh Intellectual property -- Africa
dc.subject.lcsh Cultural property -- Africa
dc.title Bioprospecting and intellectual property rights on African plant commons and knowledge: a new form of colonization viewed from an ethical perspective en
dc.type Thesis en
dc.description.department Systematic Theology and Theological Ethics en
dc.description.degree D.Th.(Theological Ethics) en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Unisa ETD [12743]
    Electronic versions of theses and dissertations submitted to Unisa since 2003

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics