dc.contributor.author | Van Biljon, Judy | |
dc.contributor.author | Renaud, Karen | |
dc.contributor.author | McGee, Marilyn | |
dc.contributor.author | Seffah, Ahmed | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-02-13T12:25:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-02-13T12:25:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10500/5397 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper the tenability of anti-patterns in Human-Computer Interaction is explored. Patterns have been accepted as being useful in software development and more recently also in Human-Computer Interaction. A concerted effort is being made in Software Engineering to identify and document anti-patterns. Patterns and anti-patterns are essentially about transferring captured expert knowledge, therefore compatibility between the nat ure of anti-patterns and the nature of the learner’s internal knowledge representation and processing is crucial. This paper addresses the differences and similarities between patterns and anti-patterns and how this impacts on the mental models and cognitive processing of patterns and anti-patterns. We present evidence from theories of mental modelling and reasoning that highlight possible significant dangers in the use of anti-patterns to teach novices human-computer interaction principles. If the notion that the current representation of anti-patterns is not supporting cognitive processing is correct, a new approach to structuring anti-patterns is needed. Recommendations are made towards a new specification technique for HCI antipatterns. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | SAICSIT | en |
dc.subject | User-centred design | en |
dc.subject | Interaction styles | en |
dc.subject | Theory and methods | en |
dc.subject | Design | en |
dc.subject | Human Factors | en |
dc.subject | Performance | en |
dc.subject | Human-computer interaction | en |
dc.subject | Patterns | en |
dc.subject | Anti-patterns | en |
dc.subject | Mental models | en |
dc.title | The Use of anti-patterns in human computer interaction : wise or ill-advised? | en |
dc.type | Article | en |