dc.contributor.author |
Van der Poll, J.A.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Labuschagne, W.A.
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2012-02-09T06:55:34Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2012-02-09T06:55:34Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
1999-07 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Van der Poll, J.A. & Labuschange, W.A. 1999,'Heuristics for resolution-based set-theoretic proofs', South African computer journal, Vol. 51, no. 23, pp.3-17. |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/5371 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
A formal specification language like Z permits the specifier to construct proofs which collaborate the aptness of the specification. This process may be facilitated by establishing a partnership between the specifier and a suitable automated reasoner. However, Z specifications are essentially set-theoretic proofs pose demanding challenges to automated reasoners. Taking the OTTER theorem-prover to be representative of resolution-based automated reasoners, we propose a number of heuristics intended to cut down the search space for proofs involving typical set-theoretic structures. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.subject |
Heuristics |
en |
dc.subject |
Resolution-based set-theoretic proofs |
en |
dc.subject |
Problem frames |
en |
dc.subject |
Resolution |
en |
dc.subject |
Set theories |
en |
dc.subject |
Theorem-proving |
en |
dc.title |
Heuristics for resolution-based set-theoretic proofs |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |