Institutional Repository

Conditional cash transfers as a means of addressing poverty in South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Van der Merwe, T.
dc.contributor.advisor Steenekamp, Tjaart J.
dc.contributor.author Govender, Megan
dc.date.accessioned 2012-01-31T12:17:17Z
dc.date.available 2012-01-31T12:17:17Z
dc.date.issued 2011-06
dc.identifier.citation Govender, Megan (2011) Conditional cash transfers as a means of addressing poverty in South Africa, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/5303> en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/5303
dc.description.abstract In this thesis the feasibility of making social transfers conditional in South Africa is examined with specific focus on the Child Support Grant. Currently, there are more than 8.7 million children receiving Child Support Grants, which is impacting positively on poverty alleviation. Yet, social outcomes, especially in health and education are poor. The conditionality of transfers will compel the parents/guardians of these children to ensure that the children regularly attend school and also utilise the health services. Conditional cash transfers, by their nature, attempt to address the low demand for these services, which are available but are not being utilised. The National Income Dynamic Study (NIDS) is employed to test empirically whether it will be feasible to institute conditionality to the CSG. The methodology adopted is to determine if there is any statistically significant difference (education and health outcomes) between the recipients of the CSG with non-recipients of the CSG. Moreover, the population (as extrapolated from the sample) is separated into four groups, namely, children that qualify and receive the grant (QR), children that qualify and do not receive the grant (QNR), children that do not qualify and receive the grant (NQR) and children that do not qualify and do not receive the grant (NQNR). Subsequently, educational and health outcomes are compared between these groups to determine if there is any statistically significant difference between them. The results demonstrate that school attendance is high among children, and there is no significant difference in school attendance between the recipients and non-recipients of the CSG; as well as between the QR, QNR, NQR and NQNR. Moreover, there is no substantial difference in education outcomes (grade repetition) between the recipients and non-recipients of the CSG; as well as between the four groups. Similar results are found for health where there is no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding utilisation of health services as well as health outcomes. Therefore, conditionality of the CSG would not be feasible, as it does not address the causes of poor health and education outcomes, which are mainly due to supply-side deficiencies. Government should rather strengthen current poverty alleviation policies which seem to be impacting positively on poverty reduction. en
dc.format.extent 1 online resource (xvii, 398 leaves) : illustrations
dc.language.iso en en
dc.subject Conditional cash transfers en
dc.subject Growth, Employment and Redistribution (GEAR) en
dc.subject Globalisation en
dc.subject Poverty en
dc.subject Poverty line en
dc.subject Social assistance en
dc.subject Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP) en
dc.subject Social insurance en
dc.subject Social security en
dc.subject Unemployment en
dc.subject.ddc 331.62417
dc.subject.lcsh Globalization -- Economic aspects
dc.subject.lcsh Globalization -- Social aspects
dc.subject.lcsh Social change
dc.title Conditional cash transfers as a means of addressing poverty in South Africa en
dc.type Thesis en
dc.description.department Economics
dc.description.degree D. Com (Economics)


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics