dc.contributor.author |
Le Roux, André I.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Le Roux, Christiaan Roedolf
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2011-11-29T11:00:07Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2011-11-29T11:00:07Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2004 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
André le Roux, Chris le Roux, (2004) "Evaluating Unisa course material using a Course Evaluation Instrument (CEI)", Progressio, Vol. 26 (1), pp. 8-22 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
02568853 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/5115 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
At the University of South Africa (Unisa), the term "review" refers to an evaluation of course
material (study guide, tutorial letter, prescribed books, etc) done by a Learning Developer from
the Bureau for Learning Development (BLD). Subheadings in reviews are indicated by means of
clear headings that divide the writing into sections.
The person writing the review has to constantly bear in mind the topic under discussion. The
logical development of ideas from one section to another, and within each section, is important.
Learning Developers are encouraged to cite relevant evidence, and to be objective and specific.
In a Unisa review, the evaluation of a module/course (using the tuition policy and the BLD
evaluation instrument) is followed by a summary and the conclusions. The conclusions should
be based on facts. Conclusions should be convincing, and any recommendations put forward
should be clearly substantiated. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
Unisa Press |
en |
dc.subject |
Learning Developer |
en |
dc.subject |
Course material |
en |
dc.subject |
Review |
en |
dc.title |
Evaluating Unisa course material using a Course Evaluation Instrument (CEI) |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |