dc.contributor.advisor |
Alers, C.
|
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Jackals, Makgatle Charlton
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-09-03T08:12:07Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-09-03T08:12:07Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2023-07 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10500/31606 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Rural development has been a crucial focus for the South African government since the inception of democracy in 1994. To address the persistent challenges of poverty and underdevelopment in rural communities, two significant initiatives, the Integrated Sustainable Rural Development Programme (ISRDP) and the Comprehensive Rural Development Programme (CRDP), were implemented in 2001 and 2010, respectively. However, the effectiveness of these programmes in alleviating rural poverty has been a matter of concern. This study delves into the experiences and lessons learned from the ISRDP and CRDP, shedding light on their limited or negligible success in tackling poverty in rural areas.
The research approach chosen for this study is qualitative, relying on individual online interviews with key government officials from the Department of Agriculture Land Reform and Rural Development, as well as the Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs. Key representatives from the Ba-Ga Motlhware Traditional Council in the Northern Cape, and the Amadebele Nzundzha Sokhulumi Traditional Council in Gauteng also participated in the interviews. The valuable insights gained from these interviews provided crucial perspectives on the challenges and shortcomings faced during the implementation of rural development programmes.
Viewing successes and failures as learning opportunities is fundamental in the context of rural development. Rather than discarding failed initiatives, understanding the reasons behind their shortcomings and drawing insights from these experiences can inform the refinement of future programmes. Findings from the study underscore the need for substantial improvements in the implementation of rural development programmes. Both the ISRDP and CRDP have fallen short of their objectives, primarily due to a lack of community- -centred approaches and insufficient capacity for sustainable development.
To enhance the efficacy of future implementations, several key recommendations have been identified. Rural development initiatives should prioritise the active participation and engagement of local communities. Involving community members in the decision-making process and understanding their unique needs and aspirations is vital. By incorporating
their knowledge and experiences, programmes can be tailored to suit the specific context of each community, ensuring better outcomes.
By integrating these lessons learned and implementing the recommendations emanated from this study, future rural development programmes in South Africa can overcome past challenges and make significant strides in addressing poverty and promoting sustainable development in rural communities. |
en |
dc.format.extent |
1 online resource (xv, 153 leaves) |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.subject |
Comprehensive Rural Development Programme (CRDP) |
en |
dc.subject |
Development |
en |
dc.subject |
Development management |
en |
dc.subject |
Integrated Sustainable Rural. Development Programme (ISRDP) |
en |
dc.subject |
Poverty |
en |
dc.subject |
Rural area |
en |
dc.subject |
Rural development |
en |
dc.subject |
Rural development programme |
en |
dc.subject |
SDG 1 No Poverty |
en |
dc.subject |
SDG 2 Zero Hunger |
en |
dc.subject |
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth |
en |
dc.subject |
SDG 11 Sustainable City and Communities |
en |
dc.title |
Rural development in South Africa: lessons learned from the integrated sustainable and comprehensive rural development programmes |
en |
dc.type |
Dissertation |
en |
dc.description.department |
Public Administration |
en |
dc.description.degree |
M. P. A. |
en |