dc.description.abstract |
Dynamics in the library and information science (LIS) job market brought about by the fourth
industrial revolution, including digital scholarship, calls for LIS schools to reconsider their
curricula in line with the job market. This study explored the education and training of LIS
professionals on digital scholarship in South Africa. Concepts from two frameworks on
curriculum development and the Gap Service Quality Model were used as conceptual
underpinnings for this study.
This study used the qualitative research approach through the adoption of a multiple case study
method. Content analysis was used in examining the course outlines in the LIS school’s course
outlines and semi-structured interviews were used to collect data from the five LIS schools’
Heads of Departments (HoDs) and five lecturers teaching digital scholarship. Five directors in
academic and research council libraries were interviewed to find the perceptions of LIS
employers of digital scholarship. Additionally, five digital scholarship librarians were
interviewed. The data collected were analysed thematically following the methods by Braun
and Clarke (2012) using ATLAS.ti 9.
The study showed that most LIS schools were not offering content on digital scholarship due
to a lack of relevant 4IR infrastructure and the available workforce to offer such education. The
study revealed that the LIS schools that were teaching digital scholarship lacked the practical
component. Academics indicated that a shortage of literature on digital scholarship led to a
poor infusion of the concept in the curriculum. It was discovered that the LIS school failed to
consult with relevant stakeholders when developing the curriculum.
This study recommended that LIS schools should develop a curriculum that accommodates the
current trends in digital scholarship. The study recommended that the LIS schools should
procure the 4IR infrastructure relevant to digital scholarship. Capacity-building workshops
should be offered to academics to develop knowledge and skills in this area. Consultationrelevant
stakeholders such as LIS practitioners, interdisciplinary fields, and the Department of
Higher Education and Technology on digital scholarship were identified as the strategy that
can help improve the LIS curriculum. A framework that could be used when developing an LIS
curriculum, inclusive of digital scholarship, was proposed. |
en |