dc.contributor.advisor |
Letete, Puseletso |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Odhiambo, Oluoch Rodney
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-03-27T10:59:09Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-03-27T10:59:09Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2022-05-15 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10500/29908 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The way of doing business has changed significantly since the turn of this century due to the growth of internet technology and the global digital economy. This growth has reduced the importance traditionally attached to tangible assets and physical location in both commerce and taxation. This implies that any country that relies on physical presence to trigger tax liability in today’s digital economy may be forced to reconsider the relevance, effectiveness, and efficiency of its income tax legislation.
This thesis postulates that South Africa’s income tax law and the international taxation principles it relies on in taxing cross-border and digital transactions have not grown in tandem with the changing landscape of today’s digital economy. The thesis contends that South Africa will not receive its fair share of tax from giant multinational enterprises such as Google, Facebook, and Amazon which operate and trade in the country, if it does not amend its income tax laws to address the challenges posed by the internet economy.
In examining the challenges posed by the internet economy to South Africa’s income tax regime, the thesis commences in Chapter 2 by discussing the growth of the digital economy and its implications for South Africa’s income tax system. Chapter 3 offers a critical analysis of South Africa’s income tax laws and the international principles on which they rely in taxing the digital economy. Chapter 4 discusses the measures that South Africa’s government has taken to tax its digital economy, while Chapter 5 compares how the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the European Union (EU), Kenya, India, and New Zealand have dealt with the issue of taxing the digital economy and the lessons to be learned from these jurisdictions. The thesis concludes in Chapter 6 by proposing recommendations that South Africa could consider to make its income tax regime more efficient and effective in taxing transactions that take place in today’s digitised economy. |
en |
dc.format.extent |
1 online resource (xvi, 347 leaves) |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.subject |
Base |
en |
dc.subject |
Cyberization |
en |
dc.subject |
Base erosion |
en |
dc.subject |
Cryptocurrency |
en |
dc.subject |
Cyberspace |
en |
dc.subject |
Digital economy |
en |
dc.subject |
Digital tax |
en |
dc.subject |
E- signature |
en |
dc.subject |
E-commerce |
en |
dc.subject |
Formulary apportionment |
en |
dc.subject |
GloBe |
en |
dc.subject |
Nexus |
en |
dc.subject |
Physical presence |
en |
dc.subject |
Pillar one |
en |
dc.subject |
Pillar two |
en |
dc.subject |
Republic |
en |
dc.subject |
Residency |
en |
dc.subject |
Significant economic presence |
en |
dc.subject |
Simplifying conventions |
en |
dc.subject |
Specified service |
en |
dc.subject |
Taxable presence |
en |
dc.subject |
Taxpayer |
en |
dc.subject |
The Income Tax Act |
en |
dc.subject |
Transfer pricing |
en |
dc.subject |
Unified approach |
en |
dc.subject |
Virtual currency |
en |
dc.subject.ddc |
343.524068 |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Income tax -- Law and legislation -- South Africa |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Electronic commerce -- Taxation -- Law and legislation -- South Africa |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Internet industry --Taxation -- Law and legislation -- South Africa |
en |
dc.title |
An examination of the challenges posed by the internet economy for the South African income tax regime |
en |
dc.type |
Thesis |
en |
dc.description.department |
Mercantile Law |
en |
dc.description.degree |
LL.D. (Tax Law) |
|