Institutional Repository

Improving positivity towards nature conservation in communities bordering protected areas in South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Queiros, Dorothy
dc.date.accessioned 2022-12-02T07:53:38Z
dc.date.available 2022-12-02T07:53:38Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.citation Queiros, D. 2021. Improving positivity towards nature conservation in communities bordering protected areas in South Africa. In Katsoni, V. and Serban, A.C. (eds.). Transforming Borders in Tourism through Innovation and Cultural Heritage. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of IACuDiT (International Association of Cultural and Digital Tourism) held in Hydra, Greece, 1-3 September, 75-90. en
dc.identifier.issn 2198-7246
dc.identifier.issn 2198-7254
dc.identifier.uri https://DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-92491-1_4
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10500/29655
dc.description.abstract Benefit sharing refers to benefits emanating from natural protected areas to neighbouring communities. These benefits are often derived from the tourism ventures within these areas and should improve the socio-economic environment of communities. In the South African context, beneficiation appears to be a key influence in encouraging communities to support conservation efforts, rather than desiring the land for alternative uses. While numerous studies have been done on the necessity of benefits, less research has focused on which benefits improve positivity towards nature conservation. This is surprising considering how important this knowledge is to community wellbeing and a thriving wildlife tourism industry. This paper therefore aims to determine which benefits, in addition to those already present, would make local communities more positive towards neighbouring protected areas. Data was collected at three local communities, each bordering a protected area containing a tourism venture – Kekana Gardens community (Dinokeng Game Reserve); Khanyayo community (Mkhambathi Nature Reserve) and Mnqobokazi community (Phinda Private Game Reserve). Participants were selected using non-probability purposive sampling. Qualitative data was gathered using focus group interviews with 56 community members. The paper first discusses the main findings from each case, followed by cross-case analysis. Employment was common across all three. At Dinokeng, locals clearly requested information, education, involvement and the meeting of basic needs. For Mkhambathi, much was said about development and infrastructure being vital for locals and tourists. The desire to be informed of and involved in the reserve also emerged. For Phinda, which has the most developed community beneficiation programmes, locals had less to say. They focused on education, particularly infrastructure (colleges and schools) and education (bursaries and nature conservation training). The paper ends by providing recommendations regarding what tourism and protected area managers can do differently in future to enhance community wellbeing and the continuance of Africa’s wild spaces. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics;
dc.relation.ispartofseries Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of IACuDiT;1-3 September, 75-90.
dc.subject Benefits en
dc.subject Conservation en
dc.subject Local communities en
dc.subject Positivity en
dc.subject Protected areas en
dc.subject Wildlife tourism en
dc.title Improving positivity towards nature conservation in communities bordering protected areas in South Africa en
dc.type Book chapter en
dc.type Presentation en
dc.description.department Applied Management en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics