Institutional Repository

Challenges that the commissioner for the South African Revenue Service’s information gathering powers pose to taxpayers’ rights

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Oguttu, Annet Wanyana
dc.contributor.author Maleka, Moseki
dc.date.accessioned 2022-09-13T06:48:46Z
dc.date.available 2022-09-13T06:48:46Z
dc.date.issued 2020-11
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10500/29354
dc.description.abstract This study is about the importance of the duty of the South African Revenue Service (“SARS”) to recognise and protect taxpayers’ rights. Particular focus is placed on the challenges posed with respect to taxpayers’ rights when the Commissioner for SARS (“the Commissioner”) exercises his information gathering powers. This study covers the manner in which the gathering of information by SARS is conducted domestically and internationally and the purposes for which SARS uses that gathered information. The term “information gathering” is not defined in the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (“ITA”) or the Tax Administration Act 28 of 2011 (“TAA”). It may, however, be understood to mean the way in which the Commissioner gathers or collects information from taxpayers. The purpose of this information gathering may be for the Commissioner to measure taxpayers’ compliance with their obligation to pay tax. The Commissioner may use the following ways or methods to gather information from taxpayers: records and books, tax returns, request for information from taxpayers or third parties, inspection, verification or audit, search and seizure, exchange of information with other countries, Country-by-Country Reporting, the Voluntary Disclosure Programme and the Reportable Arrangements provisions. The study discusses how taxpayer’s constitutional rights may be infringed when the Commissioner uses these various methods to gather information from taxpayers. The study also discusses the effectiveness of the remedies or avenues available to the taxpayers whose rights have been infringed. The study entails a comparative study of the United Kingdom (“UK”) and Canada, and compares the relevant positions in these two countries on the above matters with the position in South Africa. The aim of this comparison is to develop recommendations for solving the challenges identified in South Africa. en
dc.format.extent 1 online resource (xxxvi, 510 leaves)
dc.language.iso en en
dc.subject Audi alteram partem en
dc.subject Audit en
dc.subject Country-by-country reporting en
dc.subject Doctrine of finality en
dc.subject Exchange of information in tax matters en
dc.subject Information gathering powers en
dc.subject Judicial review en
dc.subject Legitimate expectations en
dc.subject Locus standi en
dc.subject Mandamus en
dc.subject Nemo iudex in sua causa en
dc.subject Quashing order en
dc.subject Reportable arrangement en
dc.subject Search and seizure en
dc.subject Self-incrimination en
dc.subject Taxpayer en
dc.subject Tax Ombud en
dc.subject Tax Ombudsman en
dc.subject Ubuntu en
dc.subject Ultra vires doctrine en
dc.subject Ultra vires taxation en
dc.subject Voluntary Disclosure Programme en
dc.subject.ddc 343.42068
dc.subject.lcsh Taxation -- Law and legislation -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Taxpayers -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Tax administration and procedure -- Law and legislation -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Taxpayer advocates -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh South African Revenue Service -- Employees en
dc.title Challenges that the commissioner for the South African Revenue Service’s information gathering powers pose to taxpayers’ rights en
dc.type Thesis en
dc.description.department Mercantile Law en
dc.description.degree LL. D. (Tax Law)


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics