dc.contributor.author |
van der Westhuizen, Ernst
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2009-11-17T07:55:57Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2009-11-17T07:55:57Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2008 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Van der Westhuizen, EJ 2008,' Gaps and paradoxes in theory and practice : the public sector human resource management discourse in South Africa', Politeia, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1-20. |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0256-8845 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/2900 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
There is currently a gap between the work of academics and that of human
resource (HR) practitioners. This is due to specific paradoxes inherent to the
field. Within this paradoxical context, the article reflects on a future framework
for public sector human resource management (PSHRM) thought and practice.
Academics are predominantly preoccupied with the relatively unpredictable
process of exploring and questioning. One assumes that academics seek one
universal truth, namely an integrated, structured knowledge base, as opposed
to a situation where there are disconnected facts and ideas. Practitioners find
themselves identifying (and trying to rectify) workplace problems in order to
improve conditions for all employees, and to enhance the performance of
public sector institutions. This depiction of the respective roles of academics
and practitioners creates the potential for conflict, thereby complicating the
HR component. Within this context, the article sheds light on what should be
the primary focus of academic thinking and managerial practice in the PSHRM
field. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
Unisa Press |
en |
dc.subject |
Gaps |
en |
dc.subject |
Human resource management |
en |
dc.subject |
Paradoxes |
en |
dc.subject |
Practice |
en |
dc.subject |
Public sector |
en |
dc.subject |
Theory |
en |
dc.title |
Gaps and paradoxes in theory and practice : the public sector human resource management discourse in South Africa |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |