dc.contributor.author |
Pauw, J.C.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Wolvaardt, J.S.
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2009-11-17T07:30:20Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2009-11-17T07:30:20Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2009 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Pauw, JC & Wolvaadt, JS. 2009, ' Multi-criteria decision analysis in public procurement : a plan from the South', Politeia, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 66-88. |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0256-8845 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/2899 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The South African constitution prescribes five principles of public procurement
without defining the relationship between them: the public procurement system
must be fair, equitable, transparent, cost-effective and competitive. The authors
show that techniques derived from utility theory provide the analytical tools for
analysing and applying these potentially conflicting constitutional requirements.
The current regulatory regime around the Preferential Procurement Policy
Framework Act is analysed and found to be satisfactory. Competing legislation
found in the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act and its Codes of
Good Practice is unlikely to provide such a good fit with the Constitution. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
Unisa Press |
en |
dc.subject |
Constitution |
en |
dc.subject |
Multi-criteria decision analysis |
en |
dc.subject |
Public procurement |
en |
dc.subject |
Utility theory |
en |
dc.title |
Multi-criteria decision analysis in public procurement : a plan from the South |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |