Institutional Repository

Multi-criteria decision analysis in public procurement : a plan from the South

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pauw, J.C.
dc.contributor.author Wolvaardt, J.S.
dc.date.accessioned 2009-11-17T07:30:20Z
dc.date.available 2009-11-17T07:30:20Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.identifier.citation Pauw, JC & Wolvaadt, JS. 2009, ' Multi-criteria decision analysis in public procurement : a plan from the South', Politeia, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 66-88. en
dc.identifier.issn 0256-8845
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/2899
dc.description.abstract The South African constitution prescribes five principles of public procurement without defining the relationship between them: the public procurement system must be fair, equitable, transparent, cost-effective and competitive. The authors show that techniques derived from utility theory provide the analytical tools for analysing and applying these potentially conflicting constitutional requirements. The current regulatory regime around the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act is analysed and found to be satisfactory. Competing legislation found in the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act and its Codes of Good Practice is unlikely to provide such a good fit with the Constitution. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Unisa Press en
dc.subject Constitution en
dc.subject Multi-criteria decision analysis en
dc.subject Public procurement en
dc.subject Utility theory en
dc.title Multi-criteria decision analysis in public procurement : a plan from the South en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics