dc.contributor.author |
Pauw, J.C.
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2009-11-10T07:45:28Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2009-11-10T07:45:28Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2004 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Pauw, JC. 2004, 'Higher order goals as masks : a philosophical reflection on expenditure budgeting', Politeia, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 3-22. |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0256-8845 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/2832 |
|
dc.description |
Journal article |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
Expenditures in a public budget are typically arranged as a hierarchical
tree of goals where lower level goals are understood as means to higher
order ends. This goal hierarchy is used in strategic planning and to justify
expenditures.Goal hierarchies are conceptually suspect, as higher order
goals generally underdetermine their sub-goals and vice versa.The ques-
tion ariseswhether higher order goalsmight not be a mere rhetorical de-
vicemasking the real agendas of those in power.Although goal hierarchies
are problematical, one cannot do without them. Higher order goals are
necessary froma budgeting andwell as a political point of view. Goal hier-
archies in budgets should be retained, but with modest expectations re-
garding their rationality.This article suggests a square of opposition as a
tool for analysing the relationship between goals in a budget. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
Unisa Press |
en |
dc.subject |
Public budget |
en |
dc.subject |
Public expenditure |
en |
dc.title |
Higher order goals as masks : a philosophical reflection on expenditure budgeting |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |