Abstract:
Overcrowding remains a severe problem in South African prisons. Also, mentally ill
inmates’ welfare has become of dire importance in light of the recent spike in deaths
(Etheridge 2018:10-15). According to the Judicial Inspectorate for Correctional
Services (JICS) ’s latest annual report, an estimate of 1200 (approx. 1%) inmates
has been diagnosed with some form of mental illness. The report also revealed that
a large proportion of the mentally ill inmates were treated at the prison and were
kept with the general population. The report provides evidence that numerous
inmates have a mental illness, and the Department of Correctional Services is not
equipped to cater to the needs of mentally ill prisoners. The Inspecting Judge,
Johann van der Westhuizen, strongly believes that mentally ill inmates’ welfare has
become an urgent matter because, over the period 2016-2017, the number of
unnatural deaths rose from 52 to 82 (the correctional services provided this
information).
Once a child aged between 16 and 18 commits a crime, regardless of their mental
illness status, they are detained in the various Child and Youth Care Centres in the
country, either in a diversion program or a sentenced program or awaiting trial.
However, most of these detention facilities do not have proper systems to cater to
the needs and the safety of these mentally ill youth. There is a vicious cycle where
the youth with mental health disorders continue to enter and remain involved with
the Justice System; they tend not to be just one-time offenders. There is evidence
that the rate of mental health disorders is higher among youth in juvenile justice
than the general population.
The Child and Youth Care Centres, where young people are detained for various
crimes, are not adequately equipped to deal with the challenges presented by
mentally ill youth. The staff ratio within these facilities has been designated to meet
the general population’s needs within the secure centre, and no provision is made
for young people with mental health challenges. Moreover, there are no guidelines,
policies and procedures to assist the multi-disciplinary team (MDT) with the
management of these young people. Child and Youth Care Centres are not mental
health hospitals; mentally ill children need to be placed in mental health facilities
because such facilities employ full-time licensed professionals formally trained in mental health and are on call daily to attend to the children’s needs.
This study aims to develop management and care guidelines that can be referred
to by the multi-disciplinary team when they have to work with mentally challenged
youth. Although the MDT tasked with the Child and Youth Care centres’
management usually consists of professionals such as nurses, their mandate is to
provide services to the general population within the facility and not the mentally
challenged.
This study also addresses the challenges faced by the MDT when managing young
people who have a mental illness. The study used qualitative research methodology
and the intervention design and development model developed by Rothman and
Thomas (1994). Data was collected through focus groups with MDT and peer
councillors and also through semi-structured interviews. Purposive sampling was
employed to select a sample of professional practitioners rendering these services.
Data analysis was done using the framework designed by Tesch (in Creswell
2014:189) and verified using Guba’s model of Trustworthiness (in Krefting,
1991:214-222), as well as the TAPUPAS framework (Pawson, Boaz, Grayson,
Long & Barnes, 2003). Ethical considerations were upheld when conducting this
study.
Based on the research findings, recommendations were formulated in the form of
guidelines for the management and care for young people with mental illness in
Child and Youth Care Centres.