dc.contributor.advisor |
Van der Poll, John Andrew
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Steyn, Paul Stephanes
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2009-11-05T07:32:04Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2009-11-05T07:32:04Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2009-01 |
|
dc.date.submitted |
2009-01-31 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Steyn, Paul Stephanes (2009) Validating reasoning heuristics using next generation theorem provers, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/2793> |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/2793 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The specification of enterprise information systems using formal specification languages
enables the formal verification of these systems. Reasoning about the properties of a formal
specification is a tedious task that can be facilitated much through the use of an automated
reasoner. However, set theory is a corner stone of many formal specification languages and
poses demanding challenges to automated reasoners. To this end a number of heuristics has
been developed to aid the Otter theorem prover in finding short proofs for set-theoretic
problems. This dissertation investigates the applicability of these heuristics to next generation
theorem provers. |
en |
dc.format.extent |
1 online resource (ix, 217 leaves) |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.subject |
Automated reasoning |
en |
dc.subject |
Automated theorem proving |
en |
dc.subject |
Heuristics |
en |
dc.subject |
Resolution |
en |
dc.subject |
Zermelo-Fraenkel |
en |
dc.subject |
First-order logic |
|
dc.subject |
Formal specification |
|
dc.subject |
Gandalf |
|
dc.subject |
Otter |
|
dc.subject |
Vampire |
|
dc.subject |
Set theory |
|
dc.subject |
Z |
|
dc.subject.ddc |
004.0151 |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Heuristic |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Logic, symbolic and mathematical |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Set theory |
|
dc.title |
Validating reasoning heuristics using next generation theorem provers |
en |
dc.type |
Thesis |
en |
dc.description.department |
Computing |
|
dc.description.degree |
M.Sc. (Computer Science) |
|