dc.contributor.author |
Queiros, Dorothy
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
De Villiers, Ruth
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Van Zyl, Cina
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Conradie, Nicolene
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Van Zyl, L
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-08-27T14:10:03Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-08-27T14:10:03Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2015 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Queiros, D.R., de Villiers, M.R., van Zyl, C., Conradie, N. & van Zyl, L 2015. Rich environments for active Open Distance Learning: Looks good in theory but is it really what learners want? Progressio, 37(2):79-100 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0256-8853 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/27867 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
In the open distance learning environment, efforts are made to engage students
and provide rich environments for active learning (REALs). This article describes
exploratory research undertaken on a fourth-year Tourism Management module.
The research investigated two different study guides for different years – 2012
students using an innovative guide with learner engagement tools designed in line
with current learning theory, to achieve a REAL; and 2011 learners using a traditional
study guide with far fewer engagement tools. The two consecutive cohorts completed
a quantitative survey designed from theory on learner engagement, motivation and
interactivity. The survey investigated learners’ experiences of the implementation
of four constructs, namely course design; engagement; learning activities; and
the integrated construct of relevance, application, bonding and ownership. Data
analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics, non-parametric correlations
and cross-tabulations. Results suggest that this REAL does aid learning but not
to the extent anticipated, and that it may be too rich. In light of the greater debate
regarding the design of ODL material to maximise learning, recommendations are
made to discerningly regulate the richness and depth of learning material, avoid
overload of isolated learners, and gradually introduce REALs. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
Unisa Press |
en |
dc.subject |
Open distance learning |
en |
dc.subject |
Rich environment for active learning (REAL) |
en |
dc.subject |
Constructivism |
en |
dc.subject |
Engagement |
en |
dc.subject |
Motivation |
en |
dc.subject |
Interactivity |
en |
dc.subject |
Learner activities |
en |
dc.subject |
Course design |
en |
dc.subject |
Relevance |
en |
dc.subject |
Application |
en |
dc.subject |
Bonding |
en |
dc.subject |
Ownership |
en |
dc.title |
Rich Environments for Active Open Distance Learning: Looks Good in Theory But is it Really What Learners Want? |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.description.department |
Transport Economics, Logistics and Tourism |
en |