Institutional Repository

Rich Environments for Active Open Distance Learning: Looks Good in Theory But is it Really What Learners Want?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Queiros, Dorothy
dc.contributor.author De Villiers, Ruth
dc.contributor.author Van Zyl, Cina
dc.contributor.author Conradie, Nicolene
dc.contributor.author Van Zyl, L
dc.date.accessioned 2021-08-27T14:10:03Z
dc.date.available 2021-08-27T14:10:03Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.citation Queiros, D.R., de Villiers, M.R., van Zyl, C., Conradie, N. & van Zyl, L 2015. Rich environments for active Open Distance Learning: Looks good in theory but is it really what learners want? Progressio, 37(2):79-100 en
dc.identifier.issn 0256-8853
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/27867
dc.description.abstract In the open distance learning environment, efforts are made to engage students and provide rich environments for active learning (REALs). This article describes exploratory research undertaken on a fourth-year Tourism Management module. The research investigated two different study guides for different years – 2012 students using an innovative guide with learner engagement tools designed in line with current learning theory, to achieve a REAL; and 2011 learners using a traditional study guide with far fewer engagement tools. The two consecutive cohorts completed a quantitative survey designed from theory on learner engagement, motivation and interactivity. The survey investigated learners’ experiences of the implementation of four constructs, namely course design; engagement; learning activities; and the integrated construct of relevance, application, bonding and ownership. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics, non-parametric correlations and cross-tabulations. Results suggest that this REAL does aid learning but not to the extent anticipated, and that it may be too rich. In light of the greater debate regarding the design of ODL material to maximise learning, recommendations are made to discerningly regulate the richness and depth of learning material, avoid overload of isolated learners, and gradually introduce REALs. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Unisa Press en
dc.subject Open distance learning en
dc.subject Rich environment for active learning (REAL) en
dc.subject Constructivism en
dc.subject Engagement en
dc.subject Motivation en
dc.subject Interactivity en
dc.subject Learner activities en
dc.subject Course design en
dc.subject Relevance en
dc.subject Application en
dc.subject Bonding en
dc.subject Ownership en
dc.title Rich Environments for Active Open Distance Learning: Looks Good in Theory But is it Really What Learners Want? en
dc.type Article en
dc.description.department Transport Economics, Logistics and Tourism en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics