dc.contributor.advisor |
Togo, C. A.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Zulu, Mpumelelo Blessing
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-06-01T10:21:04Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-06-01T10:21:04Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2020-01 |
|
dc.date.submitted |
2021-06 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/27399 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Freshwater resources and supplies in South Africa are experiencing severe stress from rising population growth, drought and high urbanization. The stress factors have also exerted pressure on wastewater treatment works leading to the release of partially treated effluent. The study assessed and compared the impact of the two wastewater treatment works effluent discharged into the Roodeplaat Dam. Selected physical parameters (pH, conductivity), chemical parameters (total oxidised nitrogen, phosphate, chemical oxygen demand, chloride, sulphate, sodium) and microbiological parameter (Escherichia coli) were evaluated and compared with South African standards. Secondary data (from January 2012 to December 2017) was used to identify parameters that were above or below regulatory standards. The t-test (p < 0.05) was used to compare changes between 2012 and 2018 over the same months.The results indicated that aquatic ecosystem quality has not improved, degradation continues as well as a lack of intervention from authorities. The leading parameters in causing stress to Roodeplaat water quality in descending order were Escherichia coli (E. coli), Phosphate (PO43-), Total Oxidized Nitrogen (TON), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Chlorophyll a (Chl a), Ammonia (NH3), Electrical Conductivity (EC) and Sodium (Na). One of the main reasons why poor effluent was released is limited financial investment to upgrade the treatment facilities. This research provided highlights on the need to enforce extra measures to guarantee compliance of treated effluent quality to the existing guidelines. Moreover it highlights the need for concerned department’s authorities to invest in water by allocating enough budget to address the challenge of wastewater treatment works upgrades. |
en |
dc.format.extent |
1 online resource (xii, 105 leaves) : illustrations (chiefly color); color maps, graphs (chiefly color) |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.subject |
Wastewater treatment works (WWTW) |
en |
dc.subject |
Roodeplaat Dam |
en |
dc.subject |
Zeekoegat |
en |
dc.subject |
Baviaanspoort |
en |
dc.subject |
Water quality |
en |
dc.subject |
Cyanobacteria blooms |
en |
dc.subject |
E. coli |
en |
dc.subject |
Chlorophyll a |
en |
dc.subject |
Effluent |
en |
dc.subject.ddc |
628.1610968235 |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Water quality -- South Africa -- Pienaarsrivierdam |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Cyanobacterial blooms -- South Africa -- Pienaarsrivierdam |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Escherichia coli -- South Africa -- Pienaarsrivierdam |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Chlorophyll -- South Africa -- Pienaarsrivierdam |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Effluent quality -- South Africa -- Pienaarsrivierdam |
en |
dc.title |
Comparative evaluation of the impacts of two wastewater treatment works on the water quality of Roodeplaat Dam in Tshwane, Gauteng |
en |
dc.type |
Dissertation |
en |
dc.description.department |
Environmental Sciences |
en |
dc.description.degree |
M. Sc. (Environmental Sciences) |
en |