Institutional Repository

Comparative evaluation of the impacts of two wastewater treatment works on the water quality of Roodeplaat Dam in Tshwane, Gauteng

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Togo, C. A.
dc.contributor.author Zulu, Mpumelelo Blessing
dc.date.accessioned 2021-06-01T10:21:04Z
dc.date.available 2021-06-01T10:21:04Z
dc.date.issued 2020-01
dc.date.submitted 2021-06
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/27399
dc.description.abstract Freshwater resources and supplies in South Africa are experiencing severe stress from rising population growth, drought and high urbanization. The stress factors have also exerted pressure on wastewater treatment works leading to the release of partially treated effluent. The study assessed and compared the impact of the two wastewater treatment works effluent discharged into the Roodeplaat Dam. Selected physical parameters (pH, conductivity), chemical parameters (total oxidised nitrogen, phosphate, chemical oxygen demand, chloride, sulphate, sodium) and microbiological parameter (Escherichia coli) were evaluated and compared with South African standards. Secondary data (from January 2012 to December 2017) was used to identify parameters that were above or below regulatory standards. The t-test (p < 0.05) was used to compare changes between 2012 and 2018 over the same months.The results indicated that aquatic ecosystem quality has not improved, degradation continues as well as a lack of intervention from authorities. The leading parameters in causing stress to Roodeplaat water quality in descending order were Escherichia coli (E. coli), Phosphate (PO43-), Total Oxidized Nitrogen (TON), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Chlorophyll a (Chl a), Ammonia (NH3), Electrical Conductivity (EC) and Sodium (Na). One of the main reasons why poor effluent was released is limited financial investment to upgrade the treatment facilities. This research provided highlights on the need to enforce extra measures to guarantee compliance of treated effluent quality to the existing guidelines. Moreover it highlights the need for concerned department’s authorities to invest in water by allocating enough budget to address the challenge of wastewater treatment works upgrades. en
dc.format.extent 1 online resource (xii, 105 leaves) : illustrations (chiefly color); color maps, graphs (chiefly color)
dc.language.iso en en
dc.subject Wastewater treatment works (WWTW) en
dc.subject Roodeplaat Dam en
dc.subject Zeekoegat en
dc.subject Baviaanspoort en
dc.subject Water quality en
dc.subject Cyanobacteria blooms en
dc.subject E. coli en
dc.subject Chlorophyll a en
dc.subject Effluent en
dc.subject.ddc 628.1610968235
dc.subject.lcsh Water quality -- South Africa -- Pienaarsrivierdam en
dc.subject.lcsh Cyanobacterial blooms -- South Africa -- Pienaarsrivierdam en
dc.subject.lcsh Escherichia coli -- South Africa -- Pienaarsrivierdam en
dc.subject.lcsh Chlorophyll -- South Africa -- Pienaarsrivierdam en
dc.subject.lcsh Effluent quality -- South Africa -- Pienaarsrivierdam en
dc.title Comparative evaluation of the impacts of two wastewater treatment works on the water quality of Roodeplaat Dam in Tshwane, Gauteng en
dc.type Dissertation en
dc.description.department Environmental Sciences en
dc.description.degree M. Sc. (Environmental Sciences) en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics