Price elasticity of electricity demand in the mining sector: South Africa

Abstract

This study estimates the price and income elasticity coefficients of electricity demand in the mining sector of South Africa for the period ranging from April 2006 to March 2019. A time varying parameter (TVP) model with the Kalman filter is applied to monitor the evolution of the elasticity estimates. The TVP model can provide a robust estimation of elasticities and can detect any outliers and structural breaks. The results indicate that income and price elasticity coefficients of electricity demand are lower than unit. The income elasticity of demand has a positive sign and it is statistically significant. This indicates that mining production – used as a proxy for mining income – is a significant determinant of electricity consumption in the mining sector. In its final state income elasticity is estimated at 0.15 per cent. On the contrary, price does not play a significant role in explaining electricity demand. In fact, the price elasticity coefficient was found to be positive which is contrary to normal economic convention. This lack of response is attributed mainly to the mining sector’s inability to respond, rather than an unwillingness to do so. A fixed coefficient model in a form of Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) is used as a benchmark model to estimate average price and income elasticity coefficients for the period. The results of the OLS regression model confirm that price does not play a significant role in explaining electricity consumption in the mining sector. An average price elasticity coefficient of -0.007 has been estimated. Income elasticity was estimated at 0.11 for the period under review. The CUSUM of squares test indicate that parameters of the model are unstable. The Chow test confirms 2009 as a breakpoint in the data series. This means that elasticity coefficients of electricity demand in the mining sector are time variant. Thus the OLS results cannot be relied upon for inference purposes. The Kalman filter results are superior. This study cautions policy makers not to interpret the seeming lack of response to price changes as an indication that further prices increases could be implemented without hampering electricity consumption in the sector. Furthermore, it recommends that the electricity pricing policy should take into account both the negative impacts of rapid price increases and the need to invest in long-term electricity infrastructure in order to improve the security of energy supply. A long term electricity price path should be introduced in order to provide certainty and predictability in the price trajectory. This would allow all sectors of the economy sufficient time and space to make investment and operational decisions that would have the least adverse effects on economic growth and job creation.