dc.contributor.advisor |
Craffert, Pieter F.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Daniels, John William
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2009-09-29T07:38:03Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2009-09-29T07:38:03Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2008-11 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Daniels, John William (2008) Gossip's role in constituting Jesus as a shamanic figure in John's gospel, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/2617> |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/2617 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Reading the Fourth Gospel, one is struck by the amount of talk about Jesus. Many of the reports in John describing such talk reflect the social process of gossip in concert with other processes and dynamics involved in constituting social personages in the ancient Mediterranean world.
Although there have been a few general treatments of gossip in the New Testament, none have focused on the subject of the gossip in John’s gospel, Jesus, the generative cause of the emergence of gossip traditions. The aim of this research project is to explore how gossip is involved in constituting Jesus as a shamanic figure in the Fourth Gospel.
Building on the research of Pieter F. Craffert, and thus beginning with understanding Jesus as a shamanic figure, a viable framework for identifying and explaining features and functions of gossip is constructed after considering sociolinguistic studies and a number of ethnographies of extant traditional cultures of the Mediterranean. The framework is then brought to bear on texts in the Fourth Gospel reporting or describing gossip, in order to see how gossip contributes to constituting Jesus as a shamanic figure.
As a result, this research offers a significant contribution to New Testament studies as it 1) represents an exploration and appropriation of gossip that has scarcely been exploited in the field, 2) provides a viable theoretical framework for positioning gossip vis-à-vis other pivotal first-century Mediterranean social values and processes, 3) models a new way to see and understand John’s gospel, and 4) is suggestive of an alternative to the reigning paradigm of conventional historical Jesus research in that it involves linking literary features about oral phenomena in John to a historically plausible figure thoroughly embedded in his social, cultural, and historical world. |
en |
dc.format.extent |
1 online resource (xi, 204 leaves) |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.subject |
Historiography |
en |
dc.subject |
Jesus Christ |
en |
dc.subject |
Shamanism |
en |
dc.subject |
Sociolinguistics |
en |
dc.subject |
Social Identity |
en |
dc.subject.ddc |
232.9 |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Gossip |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Jesus Christ -- Miracles |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Bible -- N.T. -- John IX -- Criticism, interpretation, etc. |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Shamanism |
|
dc.title |
Gossip's role in constituting Jesus as a shamanic figure in John's gospel |
en |
dc.type |
Thesis |
en |
dc.description.department |
New Testament |
|
dc.description.degree |
D.Th. (New Testament) |
|