dc.contributor.author |
Da Veiga, Adele
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Martins, Nico
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-09-13T10:58:07Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2017-09-13T10:58:07Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2017-05-12 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
0167-4048 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/23160 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2017.05.002 |
|
dc.description |
Please follow the doi link at the top of this record to view the online published version of this article. |
|
dc.description.abstract |
consider the possibility of several information security subcultures that could be present in
the organisation. This means that different geographical, ethnic or age groups of employees
could have different assumptions, values and beliefs about the protection of information,
resulting in unique information security subcultures. This research sets out to understand
how dominant information security cultures and subcultures develop and how they can be
influenced positively over time through targeted interventions. In support of this, a summary
of the intrinsic and extrinsic factors that influence information security culture is presented.
An empirical case study was conducted using a survey approach with a validated information
security culture questionnaire to illustrate how to identify dominant information
security cultures and subcultures. The survey was conducted at four intervals in the same
organisation over a number of years to identify potential information security subcultures
and to monitor the change, if targeted interventions for each are implemented. Using t-tests
and ANOVA tests, a number of information security subcultures were identified, mostly evident
across the organisation’s office locations (which are separated geographically), as well as
between employees that worked in the IT division compared to those who did not.The data
indicate that the dominant information security culture and subcultures improved over time
to a more positive information security culture after the implementation of targeted interventions.
This illustrates how the identification and targeting of information security
subcultures with customised interventions can influence the information security culture
positively. By using information security interventions, organisations can target their high risk
subcultures and monitor the change over time through continuous assessment, thereby
minimising the risk to information protection from a human perspective. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
Computers & Security (Elsevier Journal) |
en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
2017;70 |
|
dc.rights |
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved |
|
dc.rights.uri |
E-mail address: dveiga@unisa.ac.za (A. da Veiga).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2017.05.002
0167-4048/© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
|
dc.subject |
Information security culture, sub culture, dominant culture, influence, assess, change, quantitative research |
en |
dc.title |
Defining and identifying dominant information security cultures and subcultures |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.description.department |
College of Engineering, Science and Technology |
en |