Institutional Repository

The impact of South African automotive policy changes on the domestic leather industry

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Lamprecht, Norman
dc.contributor.author Khan, Faizal
dc.date.accessioned 2016-12-06T07:16:22Z
dc.date.available 2016-12-06T07:16:22Z
dc.date.issued 2015-11
dc.identifier.citation Khan, Faizal (2015) The impact of South African automotive policy changes on the domestic leather industry, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/21822> en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/21822
dc.description.abstract The South African leather industry has undergone a significant transformation since the 1990’s and this can be attributed primarily owing to two major factors that occurred. The first being trade liberalisation, which meant the fall of trade barriers, and the second being the Motor Industry Development Programme (MIDP), which was implemented in South Africa on 1 September 1995. The MIDP was implemented in the context of the country’s political and economic liberalisation, and the major structural shift in government policy and the trade regime. South Africa became much more globally integrated and the South African leather industry benefited because of this, as well as the incentives that was offered under the MIDP. Automotive exports of stitched leather seat parts responded positively to the incentives offered under the MIDP and stitched leather seat parts, as a component under the MIDP, became one of the best performing components being exported from South Africa. The MIDP had been terminated at the end of 2012 and is now being followed by government’s latest rendition of automotive policy, namely the Automotive Production and Development Programme (APDP). The APDP focuses on value addition, which pursues beneficiation of the country’s raw materials to the final stages, to ensure maximum benefit to the South African economy. The findings of the study entail that the South African leather industry is now in a vulnerable state because of the new automotive policy. This is mainly because the APDP does not provide the same level, or type, of incentives that the MIDP had provided to the industry. en
dc.format.extent 1 online resource (xxiv, 409 leaves) : illustrations (some color)
dc.language.iso en en
dc.subject MIDP en
dc.subject APDP en
dc.subject ATCG en
dc.subject JALI en
dc.subject NAAMSA en
dc.subject NAACAM en
dc.subject DTI en
dc.subject SAFLIA en
dc.subject SHALC en
dc.subject AIEC en
dc.subject Manufacturing sector en
dc.subject Automotive policy en
dc.subject.ddc 338.476292220968
dc.subject.lcsh Leather industry and trade -- Government policy -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Automobile industry and trade -- Government policy -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Motor vehicle industry -- Government policy -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Leather industry and trade -- South Africa -- Economic policy en
dc.subject.lcsh Automobile industry and trade -- South Africa -- Economic policy en
dc.subject.lcsh Motor vehicle industry -- South Africa -- Economic policy en
dc.subject.lcsh Motor Industry Development Programme en
dc.title The impact of South African automotive policy changes on the domestic leather industry en
dc.type Dissertation en
dc.description.department Business Management en
dc.description.degree M. Com. (Business Management)


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics