dc.contributor.author |
Schulze, Salome
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2009-05-22T11:23:28Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2009-05-22T11:23:28Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2003 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Schulze, S. 2003. Views on the combination of quantitative and qualitative research approaches. Progressio, 25(2):8-20. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
0256-8853 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/195 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This article addresses the possibility of combining quantitative and qualitative research
approaches. The paradigms underlying quantitative and qualitative research (for example,
positivism and postmodernism) are identified. The limitations and strengths of both
approaches are highlighted, and the conclusion is reached that a combination of the two
methods builds on the strengths of both. This is followed by a discussion of three combined
models: (1) the two-phase model; (2) the dominant less-dominant model and (3) the mixed
methodology model. Two research types that combine quantitative and qualitative
methodologies and are especially useful to educators are explained. These are action
research and programme evaluation. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Unisa Press |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Progressio |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
25(2) |
en_US |
dc.subject |
qualitative research |
en_US |
dc.subject |
quantitative research |
en_US |
dc.title |
Views on the combination of quantitative and qualitative research approaches |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |