Institutional Repository

Criminal jurisdiction of the visiting SADC Armed Forces over their members during peace time : a case study of the Republic of South Africa and the Republic of Botswana

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Finney, Polina
dc.contributor.author Ngoai, Madila Asiel
dc.date.accessioned 2015-10-09T05:47:41Z
dc.date.available 2015-10-09T05:47:41Z
dc.date.issued 2014-06
dc.identifier.citation Ngoai, Madila Asiel (2014) Criminal jurisdiction of the visiting SADC Armed Forces over their members during peace time : a case study of the Republic of South Africa and the Republic of Botswana, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/19203> en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/19203
dc.description Text in English en
dc.description.abstract The study aims to investigate criminal jurisdiction of the visiting SADC armed forces during peace time focusing only on the Republic of Botswana and the Republic of South Africa. Since the adoption of the Declaration and Treaty of SADC, the armed forces of both Botswana and South Africa at times find themselves on each other’s territory. Once in each other’s territory the question of criminal jurisdiction becomes imperative. The two countries seem not to agree on the content of status of force agreements while cooperating in terms of the SADC Treaty. The contentious point is that the death sentence is still a competent sentence for certain offences under certain circumstances in terms of Botswana laws, whereas in South Africa the death sentence was declared unconstitutional. In the absence of any agreement, South African armed forces may face a death sentence while in Botswana and Botswana authorities might not be able to carry out a death sentence over their members for offences committed while in South Africa. In trying to answer the question of criminal jurisdiction while on each other’s territory during peace time, a study of the evolution of jurisdiction is undertaken. The laws of both countries are considered, especially the application and protection afforded by their respective constitutions. The approach followed by the UN in sending a peace-keeping force to conflict areas is analysed. A micro-comparison of agreements concluded by selected countries, more especially the NATO agreement, is undertaken. Treaties as a source of international law are analysed to show that rights can be extended and be limited by agreement. The study concludes by recommending that concurrent criminal jurisdiction with certain qualification seems to be the accepted norm and compromise amongst the international community, and that the two countries may consider this approach as the basis for such agreement. en
dc.format.extent 1 online resource (xiii, 132 pages)
dc.language.iso en en
dc.subject Botswana en
dc.subject South Africa en
dc.subject BDF en
dc.subject SANDF en
dc.subject Armed forces en
dc.subject State sovereignty en
dc.subject Criminal jurisdiction en
dc.subject Exclusive jurisdiction en
dc.subject Limited jurisdiction en
dc.subject SoFA en
dc.subject.ddc 355.0326883
dc.subject.lcsh South Africa -- Military relations --Botswana
dc.subject.lcsh Military assistance, South African -- Botswana
dc.subject.lcsh Botswana -- Military relations -- South Africa
dc.subject.lcsh Peacekeeping forces -- Botswana
dc.subject.lcsh Conflict management -- International cooperation
dc.subject.lcsh Intervention (International law)
dc.subject.lcsh Criminal jurisdiction -- South Africa
dc.subject.lcsh Criminal jurisdiction -- Botswana
dc.subject.lcsh South African Development Community
dc.title Criminal jurisdiction of the visiting SADC Armed Forces over their members during peace time : a case study of the Republic of South Africa and the Republic of Botswana en
dc.type Dissertation en
dc.description.department Public, Constitutional, and International Law en
dc.description.degree LL.M


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics