dc.contributor.advisor |
Van Niekerk, Rassie
|
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Holtzen, William Curtis
|
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2009-08-25T10:57:44Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2009-08-25T10:57:44Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2009-08-25T10:57:44Z |
|
dc.date.submitted |
2005-01-31 |
en |
dc.identifier.citation |
Holtzen, William Curtis (2009) A critical and constructive defence of the salvific optimism of inclusivism, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/1891> |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/1891 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Questions regarding the fate of the unevangelized have been contemplated for centuries and now, in this post-Christian world, issues of the church's claim that Jesus is the unique Son of God have been added to the debate. Does God truly desire the salvation of all human beings? Is Jesus Christ the full and unequalled revelation of God? This work explores, through means of comparison and contrast, the theological positions of exclusivism, pluralism, and inclusivism. Particular attention is given to each school's history, biblical arguments, theological arguments, and convictions concerning the purpose of missions, as well as an evaluation of each school's position. The author concludes that while exclusivism maintains a high Christology and pluralism a wide-ranging salvation, only inclusivism adequately harmonizes these positions in a cogent manner. |
en |
dc.format.extent |
1 online resource (iii, 123 leaves) |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.subject.ddc |
234 |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Christianity and other religions |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Religious pluralism |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Salvation |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Christianity |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Theology, Doctrinal |
|
dc.title |
A critical and constructive defence of the salvific optimism of inclusivism |
en |
dc.type |
Dissertation |
en |
dc.description.department |
Philosophy, Practical and Systematic Theology |
en |
dc.description.degree |
M. Th. (Systematic Theology) |
en |