dc.contributor.advisor |
Burden, J. J. (Jasper Jacobus)
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Masenya, M. J. (Madipoane Joyce)
|
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-01-23T04:25:07Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2015-01-23T04:25:07Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
1996-06 |
en |
dc.identifier.citation |
Masenya, M. J. (Madipoane Joyce) (1996) Proverbs 31:10-31 in a South African context : a bosadi (womanhood) perspective, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/18145> |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/18145 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
One of the presuppositions of the present research is that readers and their contexts play a significant role in the interpretation of biblical texts. The key text of this thesis is Proverbs 31: 10-31 and the main readers are African women in a kyriarchal South African (Northern Sotho) context. Given their context of a multiplicity of oppressive forces ( racism, sexism, classism and African culture), how can these women read Proverbs
31: 10-31 appropriately with a view to their liberation? The researcher proposes a new woman's liberationist perspective, a Bosadi perspective, a perspective committed amongst others, to the African-ness of the African woman in South Africa. The question is: If Proverbs 31:10-31 is read from a Bosadi (Womanhood) perspective, how will the Northern Sotho women in a South African context find the text - a text emerging from a kyriarchal Hebraic culture? Will they find it to be oppressive or liberative or will it be found to be containing both elements? The present researcher, like many reformist women liberation biblical scholars (cf some
feminists and womanists ), argues that though the Bible emerged from patriarchal cultures, and contains elements oppressive to women, it also has liberative elements. Through the use of socio-critical hermeneutics, reception criticism and historical-criticism, evidence supporting this came to light as the present researcher re-read Proverbs 31:10-31 from a Bosadi critical perspective. It is therefore argued that when the Bible was used by the previous proponents of apartheid to subordinate people of other races, Black Theologians re-read the Bible from a Black perspective and used it for the racial liberation of Black South Africans. Likewise, an average South African woman, particularly an African woman, is basically a victim of male interpreters who use the Bible to subordinate women. It is the task of all African women to take the responsibility upon themselves to use appropriate tools in re-reading the Bible in order to discover that the Bible does not only alienate them, it is also the liberating word; the word which makes more sense to them because of their relationship with the Word which became flesh (Jn 1:1). |
|
dc.format.extent |
1 electronic resource (vi, 233 leaves) |
en |
dc.subject.ddc |
230.082 |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Bible. O.T. Proverbs XXXI, 10-31 -- Criticism, interpretation, etc. |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Black theology -- Congresses. |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Feminist theology -- South Africa. |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Women and religion -- South Africa. |
en |
dc.title |
Proverbs 31:10-31 in a South African context : a bosadi (womanhood) perspective |
en |
dc.type |
Thesis |
|
dc.description.degree |
D. Litt. et Phil. (Biblical Studies) |
en |