dc.contributor.advisor |
Jacobs, L. J. (Louis Jacobus), 1946-
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Lessing, A. C. (Anna Christina), 1947-
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-01-23T04:24:56Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2015-01-23T04:24:56Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
1997-11 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Lessing, A. C. (Anna Christina), 1947- (1997) 16-PF as meetinstrument vir dir keuring van opvoedkundige sielkundiges, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/17202> |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/17202 |
|
dc.description |
Summary in English |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Research was conducted to determine whether the 16-PF can be used as an objective
measurement for the selection of prospective educational psychologists. A wellgrounded
literature study was performed about the task of the educational psychologist
and skills and personality features which make the task of the educational psychologist
easier. The task of the educational psychologist is not of an individual nature, directed
at individual problems any more, but covers a wide field which demands that the
educational psychologist comes forward with new initiatives. The traditional task of
diagnosing, assisting, administrating and conducting research must be extended to one
which also emphasizes proactive programmes, mental health, prevention of problems
and human development. The nature of the task makes high demands on the
educational psychologist and requires the mastering of a variety of skills.
A large variety of factors have been found in literature which could make the task of the
educational psychologist easier. These factors can be grouped together as cognitive
factors, factors which contribute to the creation of an educational climate and
accompanying interpersonal relations and rapport, factors which indicate the use of an
external reference framework, and factors which indicate mental health. These
identified factors were related to the factor patterns of the 16-PF and were derived to
personality factors. These latter factors which were thus obtained, were used to compile
a personality profile for educational psychologists.
The following personality profile for educational psychologists was derived from the
literature study: outgoing (affectothymia; A+), high intelligence (B+), higher ego
strength (C+), higher superego strength (G+), socially venturesome (H+), shrewdness
(N+) and self-assuredness (0-). According to literature, withdrawal (A-) and dominance
(E+) are regarded as negative features of the educational psychologist.
The personality profile was assessed by experts with the use of the Delphi technique.
From the results of the Delphi investigation it appears that the experts support the
suggested personality profile. The personality features are regarded as extremely
important, and comment on the personality profile was positive.
The findings of the research contribute to the solution of the problem around the
selection of educational psychologists since an objective assessment of the prospective
student's abilities can be obtained by means of the 16-PF. |
en |
dc.format.extent |
1 online resource (xix, 312 leaves) : illustrations |
|
dc.language.iso |
af |
|
dc.subject |
Educational psychologist |
en |
dc.subject |
Task of educational psychologist |
en |
dc.subject |
Ability |
en |
dc.subject |
Diagnosis |
en |
dc.subject |
Therapy |
en |
dc.subject |
Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16-PF) |
en |
dc.subject |
Personality |
en |
dc.subject |
Self concept |
en |
dc.subject |
Personality traits |
en |
dc.subject |
Personality pattern |
en |
dc.subject |
Personality profile |
en |
dc.subject.ddc |
155.283 |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Psychological tests |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire |
en |
dc.title |
16-PF as meetinstrument vir dir keuring van opvoedkundige sielkundiges |
af |
dc.title.alternative |
The 16-PF as tool for the selection of educational psychologists |
en |
dc.type |
Thesis |
|
dc.description.department |
Psychology of Education |
|
dc.description.degree |
D. Ed. (Sielkundige Opvoedkunde) |
|