Institutional Repository

Pastoral counsellors' value systems and moral judgement development : a practical theological study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Pieterse, H. J. C.
dc.contributor.author Hestenes, Mark Erling, 1949- en
dc.date.accessioned 2015-01-23T04:24:47Z
dc.date.available 2015-01-23T04:24:47Z
dc.date.issued 1996-11 en
dc.identifier.citation Hestenes, Mark Erling, 1949- (1996) Pastoral counsellors' value systems and moral judgement development : a practical theological study, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/16942> en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/16942
dc.description.abstract Recent literature by several eminent psychotherapists ·such as Bergin and Beutler argues that counsellors' personal values are probably the greatest influence on the success and outcome of therapy and that the counsellor tends to convert the client to the counsellor's values. This literature provided strong support for this researcher's contention of the need for similar studies in pastoral counselling. The researcher was particularly concerned about the role of pastoral counsellors' value systems and moral judgement development in counselling situations. The researcher selected the Rokeach Value Survey and the Rest Defining Issues Test as instruments to test a sample of South African pastoral counsellors in this regard. The research questions addressed were as follows. Firstly, what are the value systems of a sample of pastoral counsellors in the South African context? Secondly, what are the moral judgement development levels of the pastoral counsellors? Thirdly, what is the relationship between the rank ordering of values and pastoral counsellors' levels of moral judgement development? Fourthly, what implications could these variables have for pastoral-client pairing in pastoral counselling? The chief findings were as follows. Firstly, the pastoral counsellors were shown to have conservative value systems with a preference for introspective terminal values over social terminal values. Secondly, the pastoral counsellors had a P score of 39.6 on the Defining Issues Test. This compares favourably with Asian university students who score between 36-40 as opposed to American university students who have a mean P score of 42.6. The researcher concluded that the conservative religious ideology of the sample helped to explain the low P scores somewhat. Thirdly, the Spearman correlational coefficient indicated little correlation between the Rokeach Value Survey and the Rest Defining Issues Test. Fourthly, both instruments indicated that the conservative nature of the pastoral counsellors would no doubt make them very effective counsellors in most denominations. They would tend to counsel in support of the status quo in the church. A major recommendation of the study was the need for further pastoral counsellor education in dealing with moral values issues.
dc.format.extent 1 online resource (vii, 224 leaves) en
dc.subject Defining Issues Test
dc.subject Moral development judgement
dc.subject Practical theological study
dc.subject Rokeach Value Survey
dc.subject South African pastoral counsellors
dc.subject Value systems
dc.subject.ddc 253.52 en
dc.subject.lcsh Christian ethics en
dc.subject.lcsh Theology en
dc.title Pastoral counsellors' value systems and moral judgement development : a practical theological study en
dc.type Thesis
dc.description.department Philosophy, Practical and Systematic Theology
dc.description.degree D.Th. (Practical theology) en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics