Institutional Repository

The business judgment rule : its application in South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Havenga, Michele Kyra
dc.contributor.author Dyke, Michael John
dc.date.accessioned 2015-01-23T04:24:40Z
dc.date.available 2015-01-23T04:24:40Z
dc.date.issued 1995-11
dc.identifier.citation Dyke, Michael John (1995) The business judgment rule : its application in South Africa, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/16728> en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/16728
dc.description.abstract The business judgment rule is used by American courts to establish whether a director has fulfilled his duty of care. It is based on the concept that the directors are legally empowered to manage a corporation's affairs, and the courts accordingly do not interfere with the exercise of those powers unless a board's action is tainted by fraud or self-interest. The courts will not review a business decision where, acting in good faith, the board has truly applied itself to making an informed decision. In certain circumstances, where self-interest on the part of directors is more likely to be a factor, a stricter test is applied. The business judgment rule is implicit in the judgments of English and South African courts and the King Committee has recommended its formal recognition in South Africa. The need for such formal recognition and stricter interpretation of the duty of care and skill discussed. en
dc.format.extent 1 online resource (x, 37 leaves)
dc.language.iso en
dc.subject.ddc 346.6642068
dc.subject.lcsh Directors of corporations -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Executives -- Legal status en
dc.title The business judgment rule : its application in South Africa en
dc.type Dissertation
dc.description.department Private Law
dc.description.degree LL.M.


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics