Institutional Repository

The vindication of Christ : a critique of Gustavo Guitierrez, James Cone and Jurgen Moltmann

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Maimela, S. S. (Simon S.)
dc.contributor.author Burgess, Michael Martyn en
dc.date.accessioned 2015-01-23T04:24:21Z
dc.date.available 2015-01-23T04:24:21Z
dc.date.issued 1996-02 en
dc.identifier.citation Burgess, Michael Martyn (1996) The vindication of Christ : a critique of Gustavo Guitierrez, James Cone and Jurgen Moltmann, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/16213> en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/16213
dc.description.abstract The problem of universal oppression has caused Gutierrez, Cone and Moltmann to advocate that God is orchestrating an historical programme of liberation from socio-economic, racial and political suffering. They feel that God's liberating actions can be seen in the Abrahamic promise, the exodus and the Christ-event. Moltmann, especially, has emphasized both the trinitarian identification with human pain and the influence of the freedom of the future upon the suffering of the present. According to our theologians, Jesus Christ identified with us, and died the death of a substitutionary victim. Through the resurrection, Jesus Christ overcame the problem of suffering and death, and inaugurated the New Age. The cross and resurrection were the focal point of God's liberating activity. Liberation, or freedom, from sin and suffering is now possible, at least proleptically. We are to understand the atonement as having been liberative rather than forensic or legal, although judgement is not ignored. Both the perpetrators of injustice and their victims are called upon to identify with, and struggle for, freedom, with the help of the liberating Christ. We agree with our theologians that God has historically indicated his desire for justice and freedom. The magnitude of evil and suffering still existing, however, forces us to abandon the idea that God is progressively liberating history. Nevertheless, we affirm the idea that the Trinity has absorbed human suffering into its own story through the incarnate Son. Jesus identified with suffering in a four-fold way, namely: its existence, the judgement of it, the overcoming of it, and the need to oppose it. This comprehensive identification gives Christ the right to demand the doing of justice, because the greatest injustice in history has happened to him. The atonement was forensic, rendering all people accountable to Christ; but it was also liberative, validating the struggle against oppression. Furthermore, at his second coming, Christ will be vindicated in whatever judgement he will exact upon the perpetrators of injustice or oppression. For today the resurrection still gives hope and faith to those who suffer and to those who identify with them
dc.subject Suffering
dc.subject Perpetrators
dc.subject Victim
dc.subject Divine option
dc.subject Atonement
dc.subject Identification
dc.subject Salvation
dc.subject Judgement
dc.subject Freedom
dc.subject Liberation
dc.subject Doing justice
dc.subject Hope
dc.subject Vindication
dc.subject Passibility of God
dc.subject.ddc 231.80922 en
dc.subject.lcsh Moltmann, Jürgen en
dc.subject.lcsh Cone, James H. en
dc.subject.lcsh Gutiérrez, Gustavo, 1928-
dc.subject.lcsh Liberation theology
dc.subject.lcsh Black theology
dc.subject.lcsh Freedom (Theology)
dc.subject.lcsh Suffering -- Religious aspects
dc.title The vindication of Christ : a critique of Gustavo Guitierrez, James Cone and Jurgen Moltmann en
dc.description.department Philosophy, Practical and Systematic Theology
dc.description.degree Th.D. (Systematic Theology) en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics