Institutional Repository

Responding to student writing : strategies for a distance-teaching context

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Kilfoil, W. R. (Wendy Ruth), 1952-
dc.contributor.author Spencer, Brenda
dc.date.accessioned 2015-01-23T04:24:16Z
dc.date.available 2015-01-23T04:24:16Z
dc.date.issued 1998-11
dc.identifier.citation Spencer, Brenda (1998) Responding to student writing : strategies for a distance-teaching context, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/16094> en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/16094
dc.description.abstract Responding to Student Writing: Strategies for a Distance-Teaching Context identifies viable response techniques for a unique discourse community. An overview of paradigmatic shifts in writing and reading theory, 'frameworks of response' developed to classify response statements for research purposes, and an overview of research in the field provide the theoretical basis for the evaluation of the empirical study. The research comprises a three-fold exploration of the response strategies adopted by Unisa lecturers to the writing of Practical English (PENl00-3) students. In the first phase the focus falls on the effect of intervention on the students' revised drafts of four divergent marking strategies - coded correction, minimal marking, taped response and self assessment. All the experimental strategies tested result in statistically-significant improvement levels in the revised draft. The benefits of self assessment and rewriting, even without tutorial intervention, were demonstrated. The study is unique by virtue of its distance-teaching context, its sample size of 1750 and in the high significance levels achieved. The second phase of the research consisted of a questionnaire that determined 2640 students' expectations with respect to marking, the value of commentary, their perceptions of markers' roles and their opinions of the experimental strategies tested. Their responses were also correlated with their final Practical English examination results. The third phase examined tutorial response. The framework of response, developed for the purpose, revealed that present response strategies represent a regression to the traditional product-orientated approach to writing that contradicts the cognitive and rhetorical axiological basis of the course. There is thus a disjunction between the teaching and theoretical practices. The final chapter bridges this gap by examining issues of audience, transparency, ownership, timing of intervention and training. The researcher believes that she has successfully identified practical and innovative strategies that assist lecturers in a distance-teaching context to break away from old response blueprints. en
dc.format.extent 1 online resource (336 leaves) : illustrations
dc.language.iso en
dc.subject.ddc 808.0420711
dc.subject.lcsh Written communication en
dc.subject.lcsh Creative writing (Higher education) en
dc.subject.lcsh Tutors and tutoring en
dc.subject.lcsh English language -- Rhetoric -- Study and teaching (Higher) en
dc.subject.lcsh English language -- Composition and exercises -- Ability testing en
dc.subject.lcsh Academic writing -- Evaluation en
dc.subject.lcsh College prose -- Evaluation en
dc.title Responding to student writing : strategies for a distance-teaching context en
dc.type Thesis
dc.description.department English Studies
dc.description.degree D.Litt. et Phil. (English)


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics