dc.contributor.author |
Singh, U. G
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
De Villiers, M. R. (Ruth)
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-02-06T16:47:14Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-02-06T16:47:14Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2012 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Progressio 34 (3) 2012 pp 125–143 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0256-8853 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/13171 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Open distance learning (ODL) is characterised by increasing numbers of students who are geographically dispersed. Assessment (marking) can be complex --efficient means of assessment are required, but this should not compromise quality. Multiplechoice questions (MCQs) offer unbiased, objective assessment, which can be
administered and processed online in e-assessment that provides immediate results. This study introduces innovative types of questions of the MCQ genre and describes a study, which investigates adoption of e-assessment tools by South African highereducation academics in formative and summative assessment. The research methods employed were a questionnaire survey and interviews. Quantitative and qualitative data was obtained regarding: (1) types of questions used; (2) questions participants believed could effectively assess higher-order thinking skills; (3) types suitable for various levels of study; and (4) the benefits of e- assessment. The findings of the study have general applicability, but hold high relevance for distance educators. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
Unisa Press |
en |
dc.subject |
Open distance learning (ODL |
en |
dc.subject |
Assessment (marking) |
en |
dc.subject |
Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) |
en |
dc.subject |
electronic assessment |
en |
dc.subject |
students |
en |
dc.subject |
South African highereducation |
en |
dc.title |
The use of different types of multiple-choice questions in electronic assessment |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.description.department |
Computing |
en |