|
Unisa Institutional Repository
|
The "Age of Enlightenment" is not the "Enlightened Age": revisiting Kant's (1724-1804) argument on the Enlightenment
Show full item record
|
Title:
|
The "Age of Enlightenment" is not the "Enlightened Age": revisiting Kant's (1724-1804) argument on the Enlightenment |
|
Author:
|
Mogashoa, Humphrey
|
|
Abstract:
|
The Enlightenment era, critical as a period in its own right, is
also a pivotal phase in the history of Christianity. Also critical
in this period was Immanuel Kant (1724–1804), a formidable
scholar who formulated and differentiated between Age of
Enlightenment and the Enlightened Age. Kant's background,
early learning and life in academia provide the necessary background
to understand the intellectual journey of philosophising
that was to culminate with, among others, this formulation and
differentiation. Kant argued that society was still in the Age of
Enlightenment because both the individual and the public are
still under tutelage that was self-imposed. Tutelage is a complex
process and has methods of sustaining and advancing
itself. It is possible for human beings to be released from this
tutelage but since the majority of the society is still under this
tutelage, society has not reached the Enlightened Age. The Age
of Enlightenment and the Enlightened Age are two distinct
phenomena, worthy of note and differentiation in the broader
history of Christianity. |
|
Description:
|
Peer reviewed |
|
URI:
|
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/4596
|
|
Date:
|
2009 |
|
Citation:
|
Mogashoa, H. 2008,' The "Age of Enlightenment" is not the "Enlightened Age": revisiting Kant's (1724-1804) argument on the Enlightenment',
Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae, vol. XXXV, no. 1, pp. 179-196. |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Show full item record
Search UnisaIR
Browse
-
All of UnisaIR
-
This Collection
My Account
Statistics