An analysis of the views of newspaper readers regarding selected incidents of intergroup controversy in post-Apartheid South Africa

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Sibango, Babalwa

Issue Date

2016-06

Type

Dissertation

Language

en

Keywords

Cultural groups , Ingroups , Outgroups , Myths , Discourses , Postapartheid , South Africa

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

This study investigated the nature of opinions and attitudes expressed in letters to South African newspapers regarding selected incidents of interracial controversy, namely the Botes (2010) and Forum for Black Journalists (FBJ) (2008) incidents. A qualitative and quantitative content analysis of these letters was conducted to gauge the attitudes that writers displayed towards members of their cultural group (ingroup) and members of other cultural groups (outgroups). The results of the qualitative analysis indicated that individuals in a racial group have different perspectives of in- and outgroup members. The results of the quantitative analysis, however, showed that the majority of writers tend to display positive attitudes towards ingroup members and negative attitudes towards out groups. The dominance of positive attitudes towards ingroups and negative attitudes towards outgroups can be attributed to myths and discourses circulating in postapartheid South Africa and the current social climate in general. The study concluded that although individuals’ attitudes may differ from the stark negative attitudes displayed towards outgroups during the apartheid era, negative attitudes towards outgroups persist.

Description

Citation

Sibango, Babalwa (2016) An analysis of the views of newspaper readers regarding selected incidents of intergroup controversy in post-Apartheid South Africa, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/22206>

Publisher

License

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

ISSN

EISSN