dc.contributor.advisor |
Saule, N.
|
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mabule, Dorah Riah
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2013-04-04T08:26:10Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2013-04-04T08:26:10Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2013-04-04 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Mabule, Dorah Riah (2013) Language attitudes and language choice within the correctional services with reference to Pretoria Central Prison, University of South Africa, Pretoria, <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/8842> |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/8842 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The focus of this study is an investigation of the language policy and language policy implementation in the Department of Correctional Services of South Africa. Language usage is a right of all the citizens of South Africa as enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (Act 108 of 1996) which is the supreme law of the country. It is imperative that language policy makers in the Department of Correctional Services should adhere to the provisions of the constitution.
It also aims at establishing whether the Department of Correctional Services’ policy is aligned to the national language policy framework as well as provincial language policy framework that provide for the use of the eleven (11) official languages in general and in particular.
In this research study, background information serves to give an overview of how language policy of South Africa since 1994 has been perceived by various scholars and the historical overview of the language policies during the apartheid era. The African languages were given a low status as the language diversity of South Africa was not acknowledged by the government of that day.
The evaluation of the contents of language policies that were used previously and currently in the Department of Correctional Services shed light to the issues of language attitude, language choice and language use in this department. During the apartheid era there were working languages set for prisoners as well as staff regarding communication either verbally or in writing in the Department of Correctional Services. The official languages were English and Afrikaans of which the latter was dominant. The question of whose language, for what purpose and how was it received was also investigated. |
en |
dc.format.extent |
1 online resource (viii, 217, [3] leaves) |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.subject |
Language attitudes |
en |
dc.subject |
Language choice |
en |
dc.subject |
Language planning |
en |
dc.subject |
Language policy |
en |
dc.subject |
Language policy implementation |
en |
dc.subject |
Multilingualism |
en |
dc.subject |
Official language |
en |
dc.subject |
Language development |
en |
dc.subject.ddc |
306.44968 |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
English language -- Political aspects -- South Africa |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Language policy -- South Africa |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Language and languages |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Multilingualism -- South Africa |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Corrections -- South Africa -- Languages -- Political aspects |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Corrections -- Languages -- Government policy -- South Africa |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Pretoria Central Prison -- Languages -- Government policy |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
South Africa -- Languages -- Government policy |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
South Africa -- Languages -- Political aspects |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
South Africa. -- Dept. of Correctional Services -- Languages -- Government policy |
en |
dc.title |
Language attitudes and language choice within the correctional services with reference to Pretoria Central Prison |
en |
dc.type |
Thesis |
en |
dc.description.department |
African Languages |
|
dc.description.degree |
D. Litt. et Phil. (African Languages) |
|