dc.contributor.author |
Terblanche, SS
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2013-03-27T14:10:32Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2013-03-27T14:10:32Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2011-03-01 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
2011 XLIV CILSA 97-122 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0010-4051 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/8826 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This article compares the legal principles governing the sentencing of
murderers in terms of the laws applicable in South Africa, Botswana and
Germany. Considerable differences in the typical sentences are noted,
ranging from the death penalty, to terms of imprisonment, with further
differences in the length of the sentences that are served. The last part of the
article argues that this situation is contrary to the concepts of human dignity
and equality, as understood in terms of international human rights
principles. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
The Institute of Foreign and Comparative Law |
en |
dc.subject |
Sentencing; murder; homicide; death penalty; South Africa -- criminal law; Botswana -- Criminal Law; Germany -- Criminal Law; Mord; Equality |
en |
dc.title |
Sentencing murder and the ideal of equality |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.description.department |
Criminal and Procedural Law |
en |