dc.contributor.author |
Egan, Anthony
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2012-06-19T06:34:36Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2012-06-19T06:34:36Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2012-05 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae, vol 38, no 1, pp 179-196 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
1017-0499 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/5830 |
|
dc.description |
Peer reviewed |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
The article proposes that one needs to understand the “action
space” of an activist clergyperson in the constraints of his/her
church’s structures which often form a kind of “Ideological
State Apparatus” that limits activism. A more democratic
church structure does not necessarily make for greater action
space; nor does a liberal theology necessarily translate into
effective political praxis. The article concludes with the opinion
that a lot more work needs to be done on these structural
issues for a better understanding of the role of clergy as
activists. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
Church History Society of Southern Africa |
en |
dc.title |
Operating in a "site of struggle": Church structures, theological stance and the activist clergyperson |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |