Institutional Repository

Did the cynics condone theft? Possession and dispossession in the diogenes tradition

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bosman, Phlip
dc.date.accessioned 2012-03-06T12:26:09Z
dc.date.available 2012-03-06T12:26:09Z
dc.date.issued 2005
dc.identifier.citation Bosman, P. 2005,'Did the cynics condone theft? Possession and dispossession in the diogenes tradition', Phronimon : Journal of the SA Society for Greek Philosophy and the Humanities, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 63-75.
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10500/5498
dc.description.abstract In this paper, I explore the evidence in the Diogenes tradition on the issue of theft. A line in Diogenes Laertius suggests that the Cynic approved of temple theft. However, before that can be taken as proof, various other factors need to be taken into account: Cynic philosophical principles, their view of the gods, and their adherence to begging and voluntary poverty. Finally, the Diogenic anecdotes dealing with theft should be considered. It appears that the Cynics could have constructed a case for legitimising theft, but that they probably neither drew the conclusion, nor put it into practice themselves. The claim that Diogenes condoned temple theft may have found its way into his Life from a hostile source, but it more probably goes back to Bion of Borysthenes. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.subject Cynics en
dc.subject Diogenes tradition en
dc.title Did the cynics condone theft? Possession and dispossession in the diogenes tradition en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics