dc.contributor.author |
Du Toit, C. W.
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2011-11-14T08:57:54Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2011-11-14T08:57:54Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2011-06-07 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Du Toit, C.W. 2011,'Shifting frontiers of transcendence in theology, philosophy and science',
HTS Theological Studies, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 1-10 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/5023 |
|
dc.description |
Peer reviewed |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
This article dealt cursorily with developments in theology, philosophy and the sciences that
have contributed to what one might call horizontal transcendence. The premise is that humans
have evolved into beings that are wired for transcendence. Transcendence is described in
terms of the metaphor of frontiers and frontier posts. Although the frontiers of transcendence
shift according to the insights, understanding and needs of every epoch and world view,
it remains transcendent, even in its immanent mode. Diverse perceptions of that frontier
normally coexist in every era and we can only discern a posteriori which was the dominant
one. Frontiers are fixed with reference to the epistemologies, notions of the subject and power
structures of a given era. From a theological point of view, encounter with the transcendent
affords insight, not into the essence of transcendence, but into human self-understanding
and understanding of our world. Transcendence enters into the picture when an ordinary
human experience acquires a depth and an immediacy that are attributed to an act of God.
In philosophy, transcendence evolved from a noumenal metaphysics focused on the object
(Plato), via emphasis on the epistemological structure and limits of the knowing subject (Kant)
and an endeavour to establish a dynamic subject-object dialectics (Hegel), to the assimilation
of transcendence into human existence (Heidegger). In the sciences certain developments
opened up possibilities for God to act in non-interventionist ways. The limitations of such
an approach are considered, as well as promising new departures – and their limitations – in
the neurosciences. From all of this I conclude that an immanent-transcendent approach is
plausible for our day and age. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.subject |
Developments in theology |
|
dc.subject |
Developments in science |
|
dc.subject |
Developments in philosophy |
|
dc.subject |
Transcendence |
|
dc.subject.ddc |
141.3 |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Transcendence (Philosophy) |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Transcendentalism |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Philosophy and science |
en |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Religion and science |
en |
dc.title |
Shifting frontiers of transcendence in theology, philosophy and science |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |
dc.description.department |
Research Institute for Theology and Religion |
|