dc.contributor.author |
Mahao, Nqosa L.
|
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2011-09-07T10:07:28Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2011-09-07T10:07:28Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2010-11 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Mahao, N.L. 2010,'O se re ho morwa 'morwa towe!', African jurisprudence exhumed, Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 317-336. |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0010-4051 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://www.sabinet.co.za/abstracts/cilsa/cilsa_v43_n3_a3.html |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10500/4738 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The article is an intervention in the discourse around African jurisprudence and its relevance to contemporary post-colonial African society. It repudiates suggestions that African jurisprudence (botho/ubuntu) is unenlightened and inconsistent with the progressive values undergirding the South African Constitution. Drawing lessons largely from the pre-colonial 18th century history of the Basotho kingdom, the article explores how popular participation in that system was a leitmotif of democratic accountability. It lays bare a number of doctrines that abetted the efficacy, effectiveness and accountability of the political system. African jurisprudence also practised human dignity in a way that pulled into harmony formal and substantive justice. It contends that in African jurisprudence human dignity was indivisible. Political and civil freedoms were not separable from socio-economic rights. Finally, the article reviews how the doctrine 'O se re ho Morwa: 'morwa towe!' not only ensured respect and dignity of every citizen, but was also the anchor of social cohesion and harmony in a multi-cultural society. |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en |
dc.publisher |
The Institute of Foreign and Comparative Law |
en |
dc.subject |
Africa jurisprudence |
|
dc.title |
O se re ho morwa 'morwa towe!' African jurisprudence exhumed |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |