Institutional Repository

Exploring social processes in transformation: the case of a collaborative water partnership in South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pringle, Catherine B.
dc.contributor.author Meissner, Richard
dc.contributor.author Biggs, Reinette
dc.contributor.author Pahl-Wostl, Claudia
dc.contributor.author Stuart-Hill, Sabine
dc.contributor.author Sitas, Nadia
dc.date.accessioned 2024-02-27T13:41:30Z
dc.date.available 2024-02-27T13:41:30Z
dc.date.issued 2023-06-05
dc.identifier.citation Catherine B. Pringle, Richard Meissner, Reinette Biggs, Claudia Pahl-Wostl, Sabine Stuart-Hill & Nadia Sitas (2023) Exploring social processes in transformation: the case of a collaborative water partnership in South Africa, Ecosystems and People, 19:1, 2213780, DOI: 10.1080/26395916.2023.2213780 en
dc.identifier.issn 2639-5916
dc.identifier.uri https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tbsm22
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10500/30893
dc.description.abstract We explore the social processes supporting transformation towards collaborative water governance in the uMngeni catchment, South Africa. Using Holling’s adaptive cycle as a heuristic of phases (conservation, release, reorganisation and exploitation) present during transformation of social-ecological systems, we consider the role of learning, power, agency and structure during each phase of the evolution of the uMngeni Ecological Infrastructure Partnership (UEIP). The UEIP is a partnership between government, research institutions, and civil society groups that facilitates broader and more collaborative participation in water management. During the conservation phase, strong control power and institutional structure (denoted by a hierarchical governance mode embodying control and regulation by the State) limited the introduction of new ideas and reinforced single-loop learning. The release phase was triggered by a shock which weakened control power and permitted the introduction of new ideas thereby enabling double-loop learning. The changing conditions gave rise to protean power (defined as results of practices of agile actors coping with uncertainty) which enhanced the agency of key actors who began to mobilise others in a rapid phase of re-organisation. Triple-loop learning was evident in the exploitation phase as new collaborative institutions, that were better able to accommodate innovative ideas, began to emerge. We found the adaptive cycle helpful for delineating phases of change, while the four multifaceted processes of learning, power, agency and structure proved useful in illuminating dynamics of change. This understanding may help to inform actions to steer transformations towards more sustainable and collaborative water governance in South Africa and elsewhere. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Taylor and Francis en
dc.relation.ispartofseries 19;1
dc.subject uMngeni Catchment en
dc.subject Holling's adadaptive cycle en
dc.subject Research Subject Categories::INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AREAS::Water in nature and society en
dc.subject Research Subject Categories::SOCIAL SCIENCES::Social sciences::Political science en
dc.subject uMngeni Ecological Infrastructure Partnership en
dc.subject Protean power en
dc.subject Triple-loop learning en
dc.subject Agency en
dc.subject South Africa en
dc.subject Ecological Infrastructure en
dc.subject Water resources en
dc.title Exploring social processes in transformation: the case of a collaborative water partnership in South Africa en
dc.type Article en
dc.description.department Political Sciences en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UnisaIR


Browse

My Account

Statistics